Seeing only REDD? A response to Law et al.

Jaboury Ghazoul; Lian Pin Koh

首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Ecology & Evolution >Seeing only REDD? A response to Law et al.

【24h】

Seeing only REDD? A response to Law et al.

机译：只看到redd？对法律等人的回应。

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Law et al. [1] ignore or misread the substantive points of our article [2]. Their first criticism concerns our apparent failure to distinguish REDD from REDD+, a distinction that we not only identify, but also expand upon. We additionally emphasize the potential wider benefits of REDD+ over and above that of REDD specifically.

机译：法律等人。 [1]忽视或误读了我们物品的实质性[2]。他们的第一次批评涉及我们明显的失败，以区分REDD +，这是我们不仅识别的区别，而且还扩大了。我们还强调了REDD +的潜在更广泛的益处，特别是REDD的潜在益处。

著录项

来源
《Trends in Ecology & Evolution》 |2011年第3期|共2页
作者
Jaboury Ghazoul; Lian Pin Koh;
展开▼
作者单位

Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems Department of Environmental Sciences Universit?tstrasse 16 ETH Zürich Zürich 8092 Switzerland;

Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems Department of Environmental Sciences Universit?tstrasse 16 ETH Zürich Zürich 8092 Switzerland;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类数学生态学与生物模型;
关键词
Seeing only; REDD? A response to Law; additionally emphasize;

机译：只看到;REDD？对法律的回应;另外强调;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Seeing only REDD? A response to Law et al. [J] . Jaboury Ghazoul, Lian Pin Koh Trends in Ecology & Evolution . 2011,第3期

机译：只看到REDD？对劳等人的回应。
2. Learning from REDD plus : a response to Fletcher et al. [J] . Angelsen Arild, Brockhaus Maria, Duchelle Amy E., Conservation Biology . 2017,第3期

机译：从Redd Plus学习：对Fletcher等人的回应。
3. Correcting Correcting inequity: How the implementation of the Kasigau Corridor REDD plus Project in fact redresses past injustices-Response to Chomba et al. [J] . Githiru Mwangi Land Use Policy . 2016,第Null期

机译：纠正纠正不平等：Kasigau走廊REDD plus项目的实施实际上如何解决了过去的不公正现象-对Chomba等人的回应。
4. Response to Ji et al.: why priori diseases are precluded by non-mammals [C] . Andrew F.Hill, Kevin J.Barnham 第四届国际分子模拟与信息技术应用学术会议（The 4th International Conference of Molecular Simulations and Applied Informatics Technologies）论文集 . 2008

机译：对Ji等人的回应：为什么非哺乳动物可以排除先天疾病
5. A short treatise on Sports Antitrust Law: Why the Supreme Court of the United States should have granted the petition for writ of certiorari in Edward O'Bannon, Jr., et al. versus National Collegiate Athletic Association [D] . Kruse, William E. 2016

机译：关于体育反托拉斯法的简短论文：为什么美国最高法院应该在小爱德华·奥·班农（Edward O'Bannon，Jr.）等人的书面要求书上批准书状。与国家大学体育协会
6. Correction for Wolff et al. Cell-Type-Dependent Regulation of mTORC1 by REDD1 and the Tumor Suppressors TSC1/TSC2 and LKB1 in Response to Hypoxia [O] . Nicholas C. Wolff, Silvia Vega-Rubin-de-Celis, Xian-Jin Xie, 2017

机译：对Wolff等人的修正 REDD1和肿瘤抑制物TSC1 / TSC2和LKB1对缺氧的反应对mTORC1的细胞类型依赖性调节
7. Correction for Wolff et al., “Cell-Type-Dependent Regulation of mTORC1 by REDD1 and the Tumor Suppressors TSC1/TSC2 and LKB1 in Response to Hypoxia” [O] . Nicholas C. Wolff, Silvia Vega-Rubin-de-Celis, Xian-Jin Xie, 2017

机译：Wolff等人的校正，“通过REDD1的MTORC1的细胞类型依赖性调节和肿瘤抑制TSC1 / TSC2和LKB1响应于缺氧”

Seeing only REDD? A response to Law et al.

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅