...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Correcting Correcting inequity: How the implementation of the Kasigau Corridor REDD plus Project in fact redresses past injustices-Response to Chomba et al.
【24h】

Correcting Correcting inequity: How the implementation of the Kasigau Corridor REDD plus Project in fact redresses past injustices-Response to Chomba et al.

机译：纠正纠正不平等：Kasigau走廊REDD plus项目的实施实际上如何解决了过去的不公正现象-对Chomba等人的回应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Chomba et al. recently examined at how present day actions can reinforce or aggravate historical injustices around land, and what should be done about it. The authors looked at the benefit distribution policy and practice of the Kasigau Corridor REDD+ Project (KCRP) in Kenya, with the aim of understanding the extent to which it addressed equity, particularly with respect to historical injustices concerning land in Kenya. We agree with Chomba et al. that land tenure in Kenya has involved dispossession enabled by colonial and post-colonial land policies, which left many local people with little or no land entitlement. However, we strongly disagree with them when they argue that because the revenue distribution policy of the KCRP mapped onto the existing land distribution, it automatically reinforced inequality. In this response, we will highlight several important inaccuracies in their paper that may give a false impression of the KCRP, then broach some of these genuine and pressing land-related issues which we felt Chomba et al. missed out elaborating on, which would have helped inform future policy around payment for environmental services schemes in Kenya and elsewhere. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：Chomba等。最近，我们研究了当今的行动如何加剧或加剧土地上的历史不公，以及应采取的措施。作者研究了肯尼亚Kasigau走廊REDD +项目（KCRP）的利益分配政策和实践，目的是了解它在多大程度上解决了公平问题，特别是有关肯尼亚土地的历史不公正问题。我们同意Chomba等人的观点。肯尼亚的土地使用权涉及到殖民和后殖民土地政策的剥夺，这使许多当地人几乎没有土地权或没有土地权。但是，当他们争辩说因为KCRP的收入分配政策映射到现有的土地分配上时，我们强烈反对他们，这会自动加剧不平等。在此回应中，我们将在他们的论文中强调几个重要的错误之处，这些错误之处可能会给KCRP带来错误的印象，然后提出一些我们认为Chomba等人的真正和紧迫的土地相关问题。错过了详细说明，这将有助于为将来在肯尼亚和其他地方的环境服务计划付款政策提供依据。 （C）2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号