• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Anthropological Research >The Evolution of Kinship Terminologies: Nonprescriptive Forms of Asymmetric Alliance in Indonesia
【24h】

The Evolution of Kinship Terminologies: Nonprescriptive Forms of Asymmetric Alliance in Indonesia

机译：亲属术语的演变：印度尼西亚非对称联盟的非专业形式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Thomas Trautmann has recently suggested that kinship terminologies with Crow-Omaha equations may derive historically from asymmetric prescriptive terminologies on the basis of very similar vertical equations. This argument is likely not applicable to eastern Indonesia and parts of Sumatra, where asymmetric prescriptive terminologies are well known. First, they have their own nonprescriptive variants of the latter, from which they may have developed historically, and second, their terminologies lack Crow-Omaha equations. The article discusses a range of relevant ethnographic cases in the context of the evolution of kinship terminologies and practices away from prescriptive systems based on a rule or expectation that all egos in the society should marry a certain class of relative. The aim is partly to draw attention to the phenomenon and account for it, as well as to qualify Trautmann's suggestion as far as these two regions of Indonesia are concerned.
机译：Thomas Trautmann最近建议使用Crow-Omaha方程的亲属术语可以在历史上从非对称规范性术语基于非常相似的垂直方程来源。 这一论点可能不适用于印度尼西亚东部和苏门答腊的部分，而非对称规范术语是众所周知的。 首先，他们拥有后者的非规范性变种，他们可能已经从历史上发展，第二，其术语缺乏乌拉哈方程。 本文在基于规则或期望的基于规则或期望的基于规则或期望时，讨论了一系列相关的民族志法和远离规范性系统的行为的背景相关的民族志法。 目的部分是为了提请对其的现象和账户的注意力，以及符合Trautmann的建议，据印度尼西亚的这两个地区关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号