...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >The effects of overhearing peers discuss an authority's fairness reputation on reactions to subsequent treatment
【24h】

The effects of overhearing peers discuss an authority's fairness reputation on reactions to subsequent treatment

机译：曝气同行的影响讨论了权威的公平声誉对后续治疗的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Fairness heuristic theory was used to examine how information from one's peers affects an individual's interpretation of, and reactions to, an authority's subsequent behavior. Participants (N = 105) overheard their peers discuss an experimenter's reputation (fair, unfair, or absent) before interacting with the experimenter who behaved more versus less fairly. Results showed that the social cues biased participants' subsequent information processing: Controlling for the experimenter's behavior, interactional justice mediated the effect of social cues on retaliation. Social cues and the authority's behavior also interacted to predict retaliation. Participants who were treated less fairly retaliated more after being led to expect fair treatment than did participants who heard no prior information about the experimenter.
机译：公平性启发式理论用于检查一个人的信息如何影响个人对权威的后续行为的对手的解释和反应。 参与者（n = 105）无意中忽视他们的同龄人讨论了实验者的声誉（公平，不公平或缺席），然后与实验者互动，他们表现得更不相当。 结果表明，社会提示偏见的参与者的后续信息处理：控制实验者的行为，互动司法介绍了社会提示对报复的影响。 社会案线和权威的行为也互动以预测报复。 在被导致期待公平的待遇后，接受较不相当报复的参与者，而不是听到了关于实验者的事先信息的参与者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号