...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >Poor Work Design Begets Poor Work Design: Capacity and Willingness Antecedents of Individual Work Design Behavior
【24h】

Poor Work Design Begets Poor Work Design: Capacity and Willingness Antecedents of Individual Work Design Behavior

机译:工作设计不佳,工作设计不佳:能力和意愿的个人工作设计行为的前提

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Few studies have systematically considered how individuals design work. In a replication study (N = 211, Study 1), we showed that students naturally tend to develop simplified, low variety work. In 2 further simulation studies, we quantitatively assessed participants' work design behaviors via 2 new measures ("enriching task allocation" and "enriching work strategy selection"). As a comparison measure, we assessed individuals' tendency to choose individualistic rather than work design strategies ("person-focused strategy selection"). We then investigated how work design behaviors are affected by capacity (professional expertise, explicit knowledge, job autonomy) and willingness (life values). For a sample of human service professionals (N = 218, Study 2), participants scored higher on enriching task allocation and enriching work strategy selection if they had expertise as an industrial/organizational psychologist and if they had high autonomy in their own job. Explicit knowledge about work design predicted lower scores on person-focused strategy selection, and mediated the effects of professional expertise on this outcome. Individuals high in openness values scored higher on enriching work strategy selection, and those high in conservation values scored lower on enriching task allocation. These findings were replicated in Study 3 among working professionals (N = 602). We then showed that openness to change values predicted enriching work strategy selection via the more proximal processes of valence (valuing intrinsic work characteristics) and affect (positive affect when enriching others' work). This article opens up a new area of inquiry: how and why individuals design work for others in the way they do.
机译:很少有研究已经系统地考虑了个人设计工作的方式。在复制研究(N = 211,研究1)中,我们认为学生自然倾向于发展简化,低品种的工作。在2进一步的模拟研究中,我们通过2个新措施(“丰富任务分配”和“丰富的工作战略选择”)定量评估了参与者的工作设计行为。作为比较措施,我们评估了个人倾向,选择个人主义而不是工作设计策略(“以人为本的战略选择”)。然后,我们调查了如何通过能力(专业专业知识,明确知识,工作自主权)和意愿(生命价值)的影响。对于人类服务专业人员的样本(N = 218,学习2),如果他们作为工业/组织心理学家的专业知识,如果他们在自己的工作中拥有高自治,则参与者在丰富的任务分配和丰富的工作战略选择方面取得更高。有关工作设计的明确知识预测了以人为中心的策略选择的得分较低,并介绍了对这一结果的专业知识的影响。在丰富工作战略选择方面取得高度开放价值的个人,并且在丰富任务分配时,节约价值的高度较高。这些发现在工作专业人员中的研究3中被复制(n = 602)。然后,我们展示了通过更近似的价值(重视内在工作特征)和影响(富裕时)的近似过程来改变更改富集工作策略的价值的开放性。本文开辟了一个新的查询领域:如何以及为什么个人设计在他们所做的方式中为他人工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号