• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agriculture,Food Systems,and Community Development >'Ultimately about dignity': Social movement frames used by collaborators in the Food Dignity action-research project
【24h】

'Ultimately about dignity': Social movement frames used by collaborators in the Food Dignity action-research project

机译：“最终尊严”：合作者在食品尊严行动 - 研究项目中使用的社交运动框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Social movement theory suggests that effectively framing the cause of a problem (diagnostic framing), its solutions (prognostic framing), and reasons to support its solutions (motivational framing) is likely to be essential for reaching movement goals. In this paper, we apply social movement framing theory to empirically identify prognostic, diagnostic, and motivational frames in the growing food justice movement in the U.S. We use the case of the Food Dignity project, a five-year, U.S. Department ofAgriculture (USDA)-funded, actionand research collaboration between academics and leaders at five community-based food justice organizations. We coded multiple data sources, both public and internal to the project, to identify the strongest and most common diagnostic, prognostic, and motivational frames used by 25 individual collaborators in the Food Dignity project. Results suggest that the majority of diagnostic frames used by Food Dignity partners did not relate directly to food, but included instead insufficient resources, loss ofplace, degraded community, and constrained choice and response-ability (Minkler, 1999) as causes of problems— though a broken food system also emerged as a causal frame. Similarly, solution framing included one overarching food-related strategy, which we labelled "great food." The other prognostic frames were reclaiming power, growing the local economy, strengthening community, fostering sustainable organizations, and networking. We did not find any motivational frames in the first round of semi-open coding. However, when we returned to reexamine the data with a hypothesis informed by our project experience beyond the textual data, we identified the motivational frame that we call recompense. Recompense suggests that those who have benefited from ourcurrent food systems should now work toward justice for those who sacrificed, usually unwillingly, to create them. This frame was mostly used indirectly and by community-based (rather than academic) partners in the project. Identifying these food justicediagnostic, prognostic, and motivational frames may help movement leaders to more explicitly examine and employ them and is an essential step for future research in assessing their effectiveness for creating a just, sustainable and healthy food system.
机译：社会运动理论表明，有效地构成问题的原因（诊断框架），其解决方案（预后框架）以及支持其解决方案的原因（激励框架）可能对达到运动目标至关重要。在本文中，我们应用社会运动框架理论，以验证在美国生长的粮食司法运动中审美预后，诊断和动机框架我们使用食品尊严项目的案例，这是美国的五年，美国部门（USDA） - 基于社区的粮食司法组织的学者和领导者之间的特权，行动和研究合作。我们编写了多个数据源，公共和内部到项目，以确定食品尊严项目中25个个别合作者使用的最强烈和最常见的诊断，预后和动机和动机。结果表明，食品尊严合作伙伴使用的大多数诊断框架没有直接与食物联系，而是包括资源不足，损失，退化的社区，以及受限制的选择和反应 - 能力（Minkler，1999）作为问题的原因 - 但是破碎的食物系统也被出现为因果框架。同样，解决方案框架包括一个统一的食物相关策略，我们标记为“伟大的食物”。其他预后框架正在回收权力，日益增长的地方经济，加强社区，促进可持续组织和网络。我们在第一轮半开放编码中没有找到任何动机框架。但是，当我们返回重新审视数据的假设，我们的项目经验超出了文本数据，我们确定了我们称之为批量的励志框架。薪酬表明，那些从我们的食物系统中受益的人现在应该努力为那些牺牲的人来说，通常不情愿地创造它们。该帧主要是间接使用的，由项目中的社区（而不是学术）合作伙伴。鉴定这些食物犹豫不决，预后和动机框架可能有助于运动领导者更明确地检查和雇用它们，并且是未来研究评估其创造刚性，可持续健康食品系统的有效性的研究的重要步骤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号