...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of business and psychology fsponsored by the Business Psychology Research Institute >The alignment of measures and constructs in organizational research: The case of testing measurement models of creativity
【24h】

The alignment of measures and constructs in organizational research: The case of testing measurement models of creativity

机译：组织研究中措施和构建的对准：创造力测量模型的情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose: Organizational creativity research has a curious misalignment between construct definitions and measurement model specifications-definitions embrace multiple facets, but empirical measures do not. The purpose of this study was to examine potential measurement model misspecification in organizational creativity research. We compare whether creativity is best assessed as a unidimensional common latent construct model with reflective indicators or as a multi-dimensional composite latent construct model with formative indicators. Design/methodology/approach: To assess potential measurement model misspecification, two studies were conducted in organizational and professional settings. For Study One, MBA students (n = 152) evaluated stimuli from entrepreneurship and advertising. For study, two professional artists (n = 167) evaluated art domain stimuli. Findings: CFA results suggest composite latent construct models with two factors (novelty and usefulness) represent creativity assessments in entrepreneurship, advertising, and art better than one- and three-factor models. Implications: Results suggest that failure to acknowledge inconsistencies between construct definitions and measurement models may put researchers at risk of reporting findings with limited statistical conclusion validity. Further, improved theories and empirical models should include facets of creativity. Broader implications of measurement model misspecification for organizational science research are also discussed. Originality/value: This is one of the first studies to examine the potential measurement model misspecification in organizational creativity research. We examined this potential using data from three domains and across two domain-specific samples. The results were robust across all samples and settings and suggest concern with respect to current methods used for measuring organizational creativity.
机译：目的：组织创造力研究在构造定义和测量模型规范中具有奇怪的错位 - 定义拥抱多个方面，但实证措施没有。本研究的目的是研究组织创造性研究中的潜在测量模型误操作。我们比较创造性是否最好评估为具有反射指示器的单向共同潜在构造模型，或者用形成性指示剂作为多维复合潜伏构建模型。设计/方法/方法：评估潜在的测量模型拼盘，在组织和专业设置中进行了两项研究。对于学习，MBA学生（n = 152）评估了企业家精神和广告的刺激。对于学习，两个专业艺术家（N = 167）评估了艺术领域刺激。调查结果：CFA结果表明复合潜在构造模型，具有两个因素（新奇和有用性）代表了创业，广告和艺术的创造力评估，比单一和三因素模型更好。含义：结果表明，未能承认构建定义和测量模型之间的不一致可能会使研究人员有有限的统计结论有效性的报告结果的风险。此外，改进的理论和经验模型应包括创造性的方面。还讨论了测量模型对组织科学研究进行测量模型的影响。原创性/值：这是第一次研究组织创造性研究中的潜在测量模型误操作之一。我们使用来自三个域的数据和两个特定于域的样本的数据检查了这种潜力。结果在所有样本和设置中稳健，并建议关于用于测量组织创造力的当前方法的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号