• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cross-cultural psychology >On Detecting Systematic Measurement Error in Cross-Cultural Research: A Review and Critical Reflection on Equivalence and Invariance Tests
【24h】

On Detecting Systematic Measurement Error in Cross-Cultural Research: A Review and Critical Reflection on Equivalence and Invariance Tests

机译：检测跨文化研究中系统测量误差的研究 - 对等价与不变性测试的综述与关键反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

One major threat to revealing cultural influences on psychological states or processes is the presence of bias (i.e., systematic measurement error). When quantitative measures are not targeting the same construct or they differ in metric across cultures, the validity of inferences about cultural variability (and universality) is in doubt. The objectives of this article are to review what can be done about it and what is being done about it. To date, a multitude of useful techniques and methods to reduce or assess bias in cross-cultural research have been developed. We explore the limits of invariance/equivalence testing and suggest more flexible means of dealing with bias. First, we review currently available established and novel methods that reveal bias in cross-cultural research. Second, we analyze current practices in a systematic content analysis. The content analysis of more than 500 culture-comparative quantitative studies (published from 2008 to 2015 in three outlets in cross-cultural, social, and developmental psychology) aims to gauge current practices and approaches in the assessment of measurement equivalence/invariance. Surprisingly, the analysis revealed a rather low penetration of invariance testing in cross-cultural research. Although a multitude of classical and novel approaches for invariance testing is available, these are employed infrequent rather than habitual. We discuss reasons for this hesitation, and we derive suggestions for creatively assessing and handling biases across different research paradigms and designs.
机译：对心理状态或过程揭示文化影响的一个主要威胁是存在偏见（即系统测量误差）。当定量措施未瞄准相同的构建或跨文化的公制不同时，有关文化变异性（和普遍性）的推论的有效性。本文的目标是审查可以做到的内容以及正在进行的内容。迄今为止，已经开发出了多种有用的技术和减少跨文化研究偏差的有用技术和方法。我们探讨了不变性/等价测试的限制，并建议更灵活地处理偏差的手段。首先，我们审查目前可用的已建立和新的方法，揭示跨文化研究的偏见。其次，我们在系统内容分析中分析了当前的实践。 500多种培养比较定量研究的内容分析（在跨文化，社会和发展心理学的三个网点中发布于2008年至2015年）旨在衡量当前的实践和方法，以评估测量等价/不变性。令人惊讶的是，分析揭示了跨文化研究中不变性测试的相当低的渗透。虽然有多种古典和新颖的不变性测试方法可用，但这些常规而不是习惯性的。我们讨论了这种犹豫的理由，我们派生了在不同研究范式和设计中创造性地评估和处理偏见的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号