• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : >Commentary 2: Empirical Interviews and Moral Engagement-Commentary on 'Interviewers as Intruders? Ethical Explorations of Joint Family Interviews'
【24h】

Commentary 2: Empirical Interviews and Moral Engagement-Commentary on 'Interviewers as Intruders? Ethical Explorations of Joint Family Interviews'

机译：评注2：“面试官作为入侵者的道德接触评论”（联合家庭访谈的道德探索）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper discusses a case vignette that captures an ethically challenging situation in qualitative research. The study was about families who had experienced a life-saving bone marrow transplantation between siblings, who were children at the time of transplantation. A difficult situation emerged during a joint family interview that took place a few years after the transplantation. Parents, donor and the recipient were present, both still children. The difficulties included a confrontation of the 10-year old donor child with accusations and pejorative statements from the other family members and his sidelining from the conversation. The interviewers have been acutely aware that their presence in this situation in this moment was an intrusion into family dynamics. The paper argues, on the basis of the vignette, that professional norms of qualitative research need to be reconsidered. Specifically, it is argued that interviewers are obligated to take an engaged moral stance, by taking a position in an exchange of moral arguments.
机译：本文讨论了一个案例的小插图，捕捉了定性研究中的道德挑战性情况。这项研究是关于在移植时遇到兄弟姐妹的救生骨髓移植的家庭。在移植后几年发生的联合家庭面试中出现了一个困难的局面。父母，捐助者和接受者都在场，仍然是孩子。这些困难包括来自其他家庭成员的指控和佩吉宣言和他从谈话中的侧面的指责的对抗。面试官一直敏锐地意识到他们在这一刻在这种情况下的存在是一种侵入家庭动态。本文在小插图的基础上辩称，这种质量研究的专业规范需要重新考虑。具体来说，据称，采访者有义务通过在交流道德论据的情况下采取良好的道德立场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号