...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment >Is Distraction an Adaptive or Maladaptive Strategy for Emotion Regulation? A Person-Oriented Approach
【24h】

Is Distraction an Adaptive or Maladaptive Strategy for Emotion Regulation? A Person-Oriented Approach

机译：分心情感调节的适应性或不良策略吗？ 以人为本的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Distraction is an emotion regulation strategy that has an ambiguous status within cognitive-behavior therapy. According to some treatment protocols it is counterproductive, whereas according to other protocols it is seen as a quite useful strategy. The main purpose of the present study was to test the hypothesis that distraction is adaptive when combined with active acceptance, but maladaptive when combined with avoidant strategies. A non-clinical community sample of adults (N = 638) and a clinical sample (N = 172) completed measures of emotion regulation and well-being. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify subgroups with different profiles on six emotion regulation variables, and these subgroups were then compared on well-being (positive and negative emotionality, and life quality) and on clinical status. A nine-cluster solution was chosen on the basis of explained variance and homogeneity coefficients. Two of these clusters had almost identical scores on distraction, but showed otherwise very different profiles (distraction combined with acceptance vs. distraction combined with avoidance). The distraction-acceptance cluster scored significantly higher than the distraction-avoidance cluster on all measures of well-being; it was also under-represented in the clinical sample, whereas the distraction-avoidance cluster was over-represented. Limitations include a cross-sectional design, and use of self-report measures. The findings suggest that distraction may be either adaptive or maladaptive, depending on whether it is combined with an attitude of acceptance or avoidance.
机译：分心是一种情绪调节策略，在认知行为治疗中具有含糊不清的状态。根据一些治疗方案，它是适得其反的，而根据其他协议，它被视为一个非常有用的策略。本研究的主要目的是测试分心是适应性当与积极接受相结合时的假设，但与避免策略相结合时，不良。成人的非临床群落样本（n = 638）和临床样本（n = 172）完成的情感调节措施和福祉。分层聚类分析用于识别六种情绪调节变量不同曲线的子组，然后将这些亚组进行比较（正面和负面情绪和生命质量）以及临床地位。根据解释的方差和均匀性系数选择九簇解决方案。这些集群中的两个几乎相同的分数在分散注意力上，但呈现出非常不同的曲线（分散注意力与接受与分心相结合，与避免相结合）。在所有福祉衡量标准上，分散验收聚类明显得分明显高于分散避免集群;它在临床样本中也代表，而分散避免群体被过度代表。限制包括横截面设计，以及使用自我报告措施。结果表明，分心可能是适应性的或不适的，具体取决于它是否与验收或避免的态度相结合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号