• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of youth and adolescence >Defend, Stand By, or Join In?: The Relative Influence of Moral Identity, Moral Judgment, and Social Self-Efficacy on Adolescents' Bystander Behaviors in Bullying Situations
【24h】

Defend, Stand By, or Join In?: The Relative Influence of Moral Identity, Moral Judgment, and Social Self-Efficacy on Adolescents' Bystander Behaviors in Bullying Situations

机译：捍卫，立场，或加入？：道德身份，道德判断和社会自我效能对青少年的欺凌情境中的旁观者行为的相对影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In bullying situations, adolescent bystanders may help bullied others, just stand by, or join in the antisocial behavior. Current studies have yet to fully examine the moral and social factors motivating these varied responses to bullying encounters. Extending from pertinent developmental theories, the present study investigated the relative contributions of moral identity (i.e., viewing moral qualities as central to the self), moral judgment, and social self-efficacy to adolescents' bystander behaviors vis-a-vis bullies. Also investigated were the interactions among these variables. Three hundred and thirty-seven adolescents (M age = 13 years, 56.1% female) who self-identified as Caucasian (90.2%), Hispanic-American (2.1%), Asian-American (0.9%), African-American (3.9%), or Other/Unknown (2.9%) participated in the study. Students completed questionnaires assessing moral identity, moral judgment, social self-efficacy, and how they would respond if they observed a peer being bullied. Moral identity predicted more prosocial action, particularly for adolescents high in social self-efficacy. Moral identity related positively to moral judgment, and both predicted less antisocial (joining in) behavior. Interestingly, moral judgment maturity primarily diminished antisocial behavior when moral identity was relatively low. Social self-efficacy predicted less passive bystanding. Overall, moral identity strongly relates to defending behavior, and-as does moral judgment maturity-predicts less antisocial behavior among bystanders.
机译：在欺凌情境中，青少年旁观者可能会帮助欺负他人，只需站起来，或加入反社会行为。目前的研究尚未完全检查激励这些各种反应对欺凌遭遇的道德和社会因素。本研究从相关的发展理论延伸，调查了道德身份的相对贡献（即，将道德品质视为自我核心的核心，道德判断和社会自我效能对青少年的旁观者行为达到账户。还研究了这些变量之间的相互作用。三百三十七名青少年（米年龄= 13岁，56.1％的女性）自我识别为白种人（90.2％），西班牙裔美国人（2.1％），亚裔美国人（0.9％），非洲裔美国人（3.9 ％）或其他/未知（2.9％）参与了该研究。学生完成了评估道德身份，道德判断，社会自我效力的调查问卷，以及他们如何应对，如果他们观察到同行被欺负。道德身份预测了更多的口语动作，特别是对于社会自我效能高的青少年。与道德判断有关的道德同一性，两者都预测了较少的反社会（加入）行为。有趣的是，道德判断成熟期主要在道德同一性相对较低时减少反社会行为。社会自我疗效预测较少的被动。总体而言，道德身份强烈涉及捍卫行为，以及道德判断到期 - 预测旁观者之间的反社会行为较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号