...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>感染症学雑誌 >Antimicrobial effects and efficacy on habitually hand-washing of strong acidic electrolyzed water--a comparative study of alcoholic antiseptics and soap and tap water
【24h】

Antimicrobial effects and efficacy on habitually hand-washing of strong acidic electrolyzed water--a comparative study of alcoholic antiseptics and soap and tap water

机译：抗微生物作用及疗效对强酸酸性电解水的习惯性洗涤 - 酒精抗菌剂和肥皂的比较研究及自来水

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The rate of bacterial elimination for the stamp method was compared with regular hand-washing (using soap and tap water), hygienic hand-washing (using alcoholic antiseptics), and hand-washing using strong acidic electrolyzed water (the SAEW method) in routine work. After routine work, the average number of bacteria remaining on the nurse's hands with using the SAEW-method, rubbing method and tap water method, were: 54 +/- 63, 89 +/- 190, 128 +/- 194 CFU/agar plate, respectively (n = 81). In this study. It was clarified that a much larger number of Bacillus sp. were detected for the rubbing method than for the other methods. After further nurse work, the most number of absorbed bacteria on a nurse's hands were counted after cleaning a patient's body. The rate of bacteria elimination for hand-washing with soap and tap water after taking care of a patient was insufficient, especially when before care was provided the number of bacteria on the nurse's hands were less than 100 CFU/agar plate. From these results, the following manual for sanitary hand washing is recommended: 1. At first, dirty hands should be cleaned and the number of bacteria should be reduced using soap and tap water or by scrubbing with disinfectants. 2. After the number of bacteria has been reduced, use the SAEW method routinely. 3. For care requiring a high level of cleanliness or if no tap water facilities are available, use the rubbing method. Finally, routine use of the SAEW method in ICU could be recommended with conventional disinfectants and soap and tap water on a case by case basis for less than adverse reactions, such as in the case of rough-hands or keeping a low level of bacteria on hands.
机译：将剪影方法的细菌消除率与常规洗手（使用肥皂和自来水）进行比较，卫生洗手（使用酒精抗菌剂），并在常规中使用强酸性电解水（Saew方法）洗手工作。经过常规工作后，使用Saew-Methofy，Rubbing方法和自来水方法，护士手中留下的平均细菌数为：54 +/- 63,89 +/- 190,128 +/- 194 CFU / Agar平板（n = 81）。在这项研究中。澄清了大量的芽孢杆菌。被检测到摩擦方法而不是其他方法。经过进一步的护士工作，在清洁患者的身体后，护士手上的最多数量的吸收细菌。在照顾患者后用肥皂和自来水洗涤的细菌消除速率不足，特别是在护理前提供了护士手中的细菌数量小于100 CFU /琼脂平板。从这些结果来看，建议使用以下手册用于卫生洗手洗涤手册：1。首先，应清洁脏手，使用肥皂和自来水或用消毒剂擦洗细菌的数量。 2.减少了细菌数量后，常规使用Saew方法。 3.对于需要高水平的清洁度或没有自来水设施，请使用摩擦方法。最后，可以使用常规消毒剂和肥皂和自来水在案例基础上使用常规消毒剂和肥皂和自来水来自来水，例如在粗糙的手中或保持低水平的细菌手。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号