• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities: AJIDD >Comparison of the Leiter international performance scale - Revised and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th Edition, in children with autism spectrum disorders
【24h】

Comparison of the Leiter international performance scale - Revised and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th Edition, in children with autism spectrum disorders

机译：孤独症谱系障碍儿童的Leiter国际成绩量表-修订版和Stanford-Binet智力量表（第5版）的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A review of hospital records was conducted for children evaluated for autism spectrum disorders who completed both the Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised (Leiter-R) and Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th Edition (SB5). Participants were between 3 and 12 years of age. Diagnoses were autistic disorder (n 5 26, 55%) and pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (n 5 21, 45%). Analysis showed that the full sample received significantly higher scores on the Leiter-R than SB5 (mean discrepancy of 20.91 points), specific diagnosis was not a significant factor, and younger children had a larger discrepancy between tests. These analyses strongly suggest that the Leiter-R and the SB5 may not be equivalent measures of intellectual functioning in children with autism spectrum disorders, and that use of one or the other exclusively could lead to misclassification of intellectual capacity.
机译：对完成自Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised（Leiter-R）和Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales，第5版（SB5）的自闭症谱系障碍评估儿童进行医院记录审查。参加者年龄在3至12岁之间。诊断为自闭症（n 5 26，55％）和广泛性发育障碍（未另外说明）（n 5 21，45％）。分析表明，完整样本在Leiter-R上获得的评分明显高于SB5（平均差异20.91分），特异性诊断不是重要因素，年龄较小的儿童在两次测试之间的差异更大。这些分析有力地表明，Leiter-R和SB5可能不是自闭症谱系障碍儿童智力功能的同等衡量标准，并且仅使用一种或另一种可能会导致智力能力分类错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号