首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Systems >Review and analysis of documented patterns of agricultural research impacts in Southeast Asia.
【24h】

Review and analysis of documented patterns of agricultural research impacts in Southeast Asia.

机译:对东南亚农业研究影响的文献记录模式进行回顾和分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Based on a comprehensive search and review of the literature, 42 studies are identified for in-depth review and analysis of documented impacts of agricultural research from 1959 to 2009. This body of evidence is subjected to a systematic, quantitative scrutiny for the coverage and type of impact to derive patterns, gaps and trends in documented impacts of research in the subregion. The analysis offers compelling evidence that past investments in agricultural research in the region have been productive. In so doing, the study also reveals some persistent patterns and identifies a number of gaps between investments and documented impacts. Strikingly, the benefits are principally derived from rice improvement research, which has generated 86% of total documented benefits in the Southeast Asia region over the past five decades. In comparison with rice improvement research, evidence of impacts in other areas such as natural resource management and other commodities is minor. This suggests that there is considerably more certainty about the ability of rice research, particularly genetic improvement, to generate impact than is the case for other research foci. However, even for rice, the evidence has been patchy across time and space. There has been no comprehensive and subregion-wide attempt to inventory trends in adoption of improved rice varieties and document historical net benefits generated by this research effort. Despite the large-scale, long-term and sustained adoption of research generated rice technologies for smallholder farmers in this subregion, an impressive story on the impacts of agricultural research on long-term developmental goals still remains undocumented. The paper also reveals a declining trend in total documented net benefits from agricultural research in recent years, which is probably attributable to research lag times and changes in the intensity of impact assessment over time.
机译:根据对文献的全面搜索和审查,确定了42项研究,以深入审查和分析1959年至2009年间农业研究的文献记载的影响。对这一证据体系进行了系统,定量的审查,涵盖范围和类型影响,以得出该次区域研究的书面影响的模式,差距和趋势。该分析提供了令人信服的证据,表明该地区过去在农业研究方面的投资是富有成效的。通过这样做,该研究还揭示了一些持久的模式,并确定了投资与书面影响之间的许多差距。引人注目的是,这些收益主要来自稻米改良研究,在过去的五十年中,该研究已在东南亚地区产生了有记录的总收益的86%。与水稻改良研究相比,在自然资源管理和其他商品等其他领域产生影响的证据很少。这表明,与其他研究重点相比,水稻研究尤其是遗传改良产生影响的能力具有更大的确定性。但是,即使对于大米,证据在时间和空间上也是零散的。没有进行全面的和次区域范围的尝试来盘点采用改良稻米品种的趋势并记录该研究工作产生的历史净收益的尝试。尽管大规模,长期和持续采用研究为该次区域的小农户提供了稻米技术,但有关农业研究对长期发展目标的影响的令人印象深刻的故事仍然没有记载。该论文还揭示了近年来农业研究的总有记录净收益的下降趋势,这可能归因于研究滞后时间和影响评估强度随时间的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号