• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical EEG and neuroscience: official journal of the EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society (ENCS) >The Nature of EEG Reactivity to Light, Sound, and Pain Stimulation in Neurosurgical Comatose Patients Evaluated by a Quantitative Method
【24h】

The Nature of EEG Reactivity to Light, Sound, and Pain Stimulation in Neurosurgical Comatose Patients Evaluated by a Quantitative Method

机译：通过定量方法评估的神经外科患者的光，声音和疼痛刺激的eEG反应性的性质

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

EEG reactivity (EEG-R) is regarded as an important parameter in coma prognosis but knowledge is sparse on the nature of EEG changes due to different kinds of stimulation and their prognostic significance. EEG-R was quantified in a study of 39 comatose neurosurgical patients. Six 30-second standardized visual, auditory, and painful stimulations were applied. EEG-R in the delta, theta, alpha, and beta band was normalized in z -scores as the power of a stimulation epoch relative to average power of 6 resting epochs. Outcome measure was 3 months Glasgow Outcome Scale. Increase in EEG activity was related to poor outcome, was more common (13.4% of tests), and grew continuously during the 30-second stimulation epoch. Decrease in EEG activity was related to good outcome, was rarer (2.5%), and peaked around 15 seconds. Pain was the most provocative stimulation (20.4%) followed by sound (8.7%) and eye-opening (6.7%). Discrimination between good (n = 6) and poor (n = 33) outcome was best in the theta and alpha bands for pain stimulation in the first 10-20 seconds and for sound stimulation in the first 5 to 10 seconds, eye-opening did not discriminate. Increase in activity predicted poor outcome with a high specificity 100% (CI = 52%-100%) and a modest sensitivity of 39% (CI = 23%-58%). Decrease in activity predicted good outcome with a high specificity of 100% (CI = 87%-100%) and a modest sensitivity of 33% (CI = 6%-76%). This quantitative study reveals new knowledge about the nature of EEG-R, which contribute to the development of more reliable and objective clinical procedures for outcome prediction.
机译：None

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号