...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of advanced nursing >Language consistency: a missing link in theory, research and reasoning?
【24h】

Language consistency: a missing link in theory, research and reasoning?

机译：语言一致性：理论，研究和推理的缺失链接？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Language consistency: a missing link in theory, research and reasoning? Aim. This paper is a report of a study conducted to determine if there is a lack of language consistency in nursing texts and among nursing educators related to theory, research and reasoning. Background. Analysis of international language, communication and nursing literature revealed the essential role language consistency plays in promoting competency and desirable behavioural outcomes. It also revealed the difficulty nursing has had in gaining consistency of language associated with theory, research and reasoning. Method. Six nursing theory, research and terminology texts with international circulation were analysed to identify key words related to theory, research and reasoning and to determine consistency of definitions among texts. Next, 97 nursing educators were surveyed to determine their ability to define the same key words. Educators were recruited during three national nursing education meetings in the United States of America between 2006 and 2007. Findings. Analysis revealed significant variability in definitions of key words among texts and in nursing educators' ability to match any defining words used by the texts and by each other. Conclusion. Epistemologically, the use of inconsistent language among texts and educators may be playing a role in the continuing marginalization of theory, research and reasoning in nursing education and practice; ultimately, hindering the profession's epistemological growth. Recommendations include a call for consensus of key words and meanings associated with theory, research and reasoning and the development of a language essentials document to support development of competency.
机译：语言一致性：理论、研究和推理中缺失的一环？目标本文是一项研究的报告，旨在确定护理文本以及护理教育者在理论、研究和推理方面是否缺乏语言一致性。出身背景对国际语言、沟通和护理文献的分析揭示了语言一致性在提高能力和期望的行为结果方面的重要作用。它还揭示了护理在获得与理论、研究和推理相关的语言一致性方面的困难。方法分析了六篇国际流传的护理理论、研究和术语文本，以确定与理论、研究和推理相关的关键词，并确定文本之间定义的一致性。接下来，对97名护理教育工作者进行了调查，以确定他们定义相同关键词的能力。2006年至2007年间，在美国的三次全国护理教育会议上招募了教育工作者。调查结果。分析显示，文本中的关键词定义以及护理教育者匹配文本和彼此使用的任何定义词的能力存在显著差异。结论从认识论的角度来看，文本和教育者之间使用不一致的语言可能是护理教育和实践中理论、研究和推理继续边缘化的原因之一；最终，阻碍了该行业的认识论发展。建议包括呼吁就与理论、研究和推理相关的关键词和含义达成共识，并制定语言要素文件，以支持能力发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号