• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering >Progress In Reforming Chemical Engineering Education
【24h】

Progress In Reforming Chemical Engineering Education

机译：化工教育改革进展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Three successful historical reforms of chemical engineering education were the triumph of chemical engineering over industrial chemistry, the engineering science revolution, and Engineering Criteria 2000. Current attempts to change teaching methods have relied heavily on dissemination of the results of engineering-education research that show superior student learning with active learning methods. Although slow dissemination of education research results is probably a contributing cause to the slowness of reform, two other causes are likely much more significant. First, teaching is the primary interest of only approximately one-half of engineering faculty. Second, the vast majority of engineering faculty have no training in teaching, but trained professors are on average better teachers. Significant progress in reform will occur if organizations with leverage—National Science Foundation, through CAREER grants, and the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET—use that leverage to require faculty to be trained in pedagogy.
机译：化学工程教育的三个成功的历史性改革是化学工程在工业化学方面的胜利，工程科学革命和2000年工程标准。当前改变教学方法的尝试在很大程度上依赖于传播工程学研究结果的研究，该研究结果显示出卓越的通过积极的学习方法进行学生学习。尽管教育研究成果的缓慢传播可能是导致改革缓慢的原因，但另外两个原因则可能更为重要。首先，只有大约一半的工程系教师才是主要兴趣。其次，绝大多数工程学院的教师没有接受过培训，但是受过训练的教授平均而言是更好的教师。如果具有杠杆作用的组织（国家科学基金会通过CAREER赠款和ABET工程鉴定委员会）利用这种杠杆作用要求教师接受教学法方面的培训，改革将取得重大进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号