首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures.
【24h】

Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures.

机译:与编织聚酯和单丝聚二恶烷酮缝合线相比,编织混纺聚乙烯缝合线的机械和处理性能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: This study was designed to comprehensively compare the mechanical properties of 4 types of braided polyblend sutures with widely used braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures. METHODS: Polyblend polyethylene sutures (FiberWire [Arthrex, Naples, FL], Herculine [Linvatec, Largo, FL], Orthocord [DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA], and Ultrabraid [Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, MA]), a braided polyester suture (Ethibond; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ), and an absorbable monofilament polydioxanone suture (PDS II; Ethicon), all USP No. 2, were mechanically tested. Fraying resistance was tested on eyelets of metallic and absorbable suture anchors. Cartilage abrasion caused by an intra-articularly placed suture knot was simulated by fraying on distal porcine femora. RESULTS: All polyblend sutures were stronger than Ethibond or PDS II sutures by at least a factor of 2, with or without a knot. When knotted, Herculine (261 +/- 44 N) was strongest, followed by Ultrabraid (244 +/- 3 N). FiberWire was most resistant against fraying on metallic anchors. Orthocord was by far least abrasive with absorbable anchors. Resistance to fraying was 100- to 500-fold (absorbable anchors) and 6- to 30-fold (metallic anchor) better for all polyblend sutures than for Ethibond. All braided sutures caused a similar amount of abrasion of joint cartilage, but they caused significantly more abrasion (>20-fold) than the monofilament degradable suture. CONCLUSIONS: The ultimate strength of polyblend suture material was 2- to 2.5-fold greater than that of polyester or polydioxanone sutures, but the resistance to fraying was up to 500-fold greater than that of polyester or polydioxanone sutures. With regard to strength, this makes polyblend sutures particularly advantageous for use with metallic edges of anchors or prostheses or with absorbable anchor eyelets. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: With a high resistance to fraying against metallic edges or a decrease in cutting of absorbable suture eyelets being up to 500-fold greater than with polyester or polydioxanone sutures, the new polyblend sutures appear to fill a void in the armamentarium of the surgeon, provided that at least 2 throws more than with conventional sutures are used for knot tying.
机译:目的:本研究旨在全面比较四种类型的编织混纺缝合线与广泛使用的编织聚酯和单丝聚二恶烷酮缝合线的力学性能。方法:聚丙烯编织线(FiberWire [Arthrex,Naples,FL],Herculine [Linvatec,Largo,FL],Orthocord [DePuy Mitek,Raynham,MA]和Ultrabraid [Smith&Nephew Endoscopy,Andover,MA])编织而成。对所有USP No.2的聚酯缝合线(Ethibond; Ethicon,Somerville,NJ)和可吸收的单丝聚二恶烷酮缝合线(PDS II; Ethicon)进行了机械测试。在金属和可吸收的缝合锚钉的孔眼上测试了抗断裂性。通过在远端猪股骨上磨损,模拟了由关节内放置的缝合线结引起的软骨磨损。结果:所有的混纺缝合线都比Ethibond或PDS II缝合线强2倍,有或没有结。打结时,Herculine(261 +/- 44 N)最强,其次是Ultrabraid(244 +/- 3 N)。 FiberWire最能抵抗金属锚的磨损。 Orthocord至少具有可吸收锚点的磨料。与Ethibond相比,所有多混纺缝线的抗磨损性提高了100到500倍(可吸收锚钉),而抗磨损能力提高了6到30倍(金属锚钉)。所有的编织缝线对关节软骨的磨损量相近,但与单丝可降解缝线相比,它们造成的磨损量(> 20倍)要多得多。结论:混合缝线材料的极限强度是聚酯或聚二恶烷酮缝线的2至2.5倍,但抗磨损性却比聚酯或聚二恶烷酮缝线高500倍。关于强度,这使得多掺混物缝合线特别适合用于锚或假体的金属边缘或可吸收的锚眼。临床意义:与聚酯或聚二恶烷酮缝合线相比,抗金属边缘磨损或可吸收缝合线孔眼的切割减少性高至聚酯或聚二恶烷酮缝合线的最大500倍,新的混合混合缝合线似乎填补了外科医生武器库中的空白,如果至少要比传统缝线多掷2根用于打结。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号