...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Brain injury: BI >Assessment of anosognosia in persons with frontal lobe damage: clinical utility of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI).
【24h】

Assessment of anosognosia in persons with frontal lobe damage: clinical utility of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI).

机译：额叶损伤患者的失音症评估：Mayo-Portland适应性调查表（MPAI）的临床应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To determine if the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI) demonstrates clinical utility in differentiating between persons with severe TBI and frontal lobe damage/anosognosia and persons with mild TBI and no frontal lobe damage. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-three persons with TBI and documented frontal lobe damage (mean age = 34; mean time since injury = 5.2 years) and 69 persons with mild TBI and no frontal lobe damage (mean age = 34.3; mean time since injury = 4.8 4.8 years). MEASURE: MPAI. RESULTS: Total inventory and select sub-category difference scores were significantly greater in the frontal lobe group than in the non-frontal lobe group. However, as expected, there was no significant difference between the two groups on the mobility sub-category difference scores. CONCLUSIONS: The MPAI appears to be potentially clinically useful in assessing for frontal lobe damage and associated anosognosia in patients with TBI.
机译：目的：确定梅奥-波特兰适应性清单（MPAI）在区分严重TBI和额叶损害/失语症患者与轻度TBI和额叶无损害者之间是否具有临床应用价值。参与者：四十三名患有TBI并有额叶损伤的记录者（平均年龄= 34;受伤后的平均时间= 5.2岁）和69名患有轻度TBI且无额叶损伤的人（平均年龄= 34.3;受伤后的平均时间= 4.8） 4.8年）。措施：MPAI。结果：额叶组的总库存量和选择的子类别差异评分显着高于非额叶组。但是，正如预期的那样，两组之间在流动性子类别差异评分上没有显着差异。结论：MPAI在评估TBI患者的额叶损伤和相关的失声诊断方面似乎具有潜在的临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号