首页> 外文期刊>Attention, perception & psychophysics >Exploring attention-based explanations for some violations of Hick’s law for aimed movements
【24h】

Exploring attention-based explanations for some violations of Hick’s law for aimed movements

机译:探索基于注意力的针对某些针对希克定律的违反希克定律的解释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Choice reaction time generally increases linearly with the logarithm of the number of potential stimulus–response alternatives, a regularity known as Hick’s law. Two apparent violations of this generalization, which have been reported for aimed eye movements (Kveraga, Boucher, & Hughes, Experimental Brain Research, 146, 307–314, 2002), and arm movements (Wright, Marino, Belovsky, & Chubb, Experimental Brain Research, 179, 475–496, 2007), occurred when the indicator stimulus was an abrupt change at the location that was the target of the to-be-made movement. We report two experiments that examined and rejected the hypothesis that these abrupt-onset indicator stimuli triggered a shift in exogenous attention and that this led to unusually small uncertainty effects. Each experiment compared this indicator stimulus with a single alternative: Experiment 1 tested an indicator stimulus at all locations other than the target; Experiment 2 tested a central pointer to the target. Neither alternative led to an uncertainty effect for pointing responses that was of the size typically observed for other responses using the same stimuli.
机译:选择反应时间通常随潜在刺激-反应替代方案的数量的对数线性增加,这种规律称为希克定律。据报道,针对眼球运动(Kveraga,Boucher和Hughes,Experimental Brain Research,146,307-314,2002)和手臂运动(Wright,Marino,Belovsky和Chubb,实验性)有两种明显违反这一概括的行为。 Brain Research,179,475–496,2007),发生在指标刺激是要进行运动的目标位置突然变化时。我们报告了两个实验,这些实验检查并拒绝了以下假设:这些突然发作的指标刺激触发了外源注意力的转移,并且这导致异常小的不确定性影响。每个实验都将指标刺激与一个替代方案进行了比较:实验1在目标以外的所有位置测试了指标刺激;实验2测试了指向目标的中心指针。两种选择都不会导致指向响应的不确定性影响,该不确定性影响的大小通常是使用相同刺激的其他响应所观察到的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号