...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Intelligence: A Multidisciplinary Journal >Who are the 'Clever Sillies'? The intelligence, personality, and motives of clever silly originators and those who follow them
【24h】

Who are the 'Clever Sillies'? The intelligence, personality, and motives of clever silly originators and those who follow them

机译：谁是“聪明的傻子”？聪明愚蠢的创始者及其追随者的才智，个性和动机

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Charlton's (2009) Clever Sillies model argues that high IQ people lack common sense and advocate foolish ideas due to the personality disposition that is associated with high IQ. We argue that the "Clever Silly" model proposed by Charlton has several shortcomings and needs to be nuanced. We suggest that it is useful to distinguish between scholars who advocate clever silly ideas in a context in which they are popular (followers) and those who originate them. The originators are close to the artistic genius type while the followers are the more average academics, especially in non-science subjects. The former has highly original and controversial ideas and take considerable risk for the potential high socioeconomic status pay off involved. The latter is less inclined to take risks and thus strikes the optimum balance, in terms of conformity and non-conformity, in order to showcase their intelligence but gain the benefits of conforming. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译：Charlton（2009）的Clever Sillies模型认为，智商高的人缺乏常识，并且提倡愚蠢的想法，因为与智商高的人格倾向有关。我们认为，查尔顿提出的“聪明傻”模型存在一些缺陷，需要加以细化。我们建议，在主张流行（跟随者）的背景下区分聪明的愚蠢想法的学者和提出这些想法的学者之间进行区分是有用的。创始者接近艺术天才类型，而追随者则是较为普通的学者，尤其是非科学学科的学者。前者具有高度原创性和争议性的想法，并且冒着潜在的高社会经济地位回报的风险。后者不太愿意冒险，因此在合规性和不合规性方面达到了最佳的平衡，以便展示其智能，但获得了合规性的好处。 （C）2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号