• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Internal medicine journal >Federal funding for embryonic stem cell research: are we all on board?
【24h】

Federal funding for embryonic stem cell research: are we all on board?

机译：联邦为胚胎干细胞研究提供资金：我们都参加了吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Approximately three decades ago, James Watson, testifying before Congress on the prospect of human cloning, made this statement: 'This is not a decision for the scientists at all'. It is a decision of the general public - do you want this or not?'1 After the successful cloning of Dolly in 1997, the debate on human embryonic stem cell research has focused on trying to answer one main question: should the government assign federal funds to promote and help finance this relatively new scientific interest?This is an issue that affects society as a whole. If we aspire to conform to Watson's statement, and I think we should, several questions have to be raised: (i) are we taking into consideration the opinion of the general public in this matter? (ii) has the general public been provided with the much needed tools to understand this complex topic and therefore have a conscientious opinion? and (iii) what political, educational, and economic means should we employ to achieve a general, well represented consensus on the different issues derived from the application of this new technology?
机译：大约三十年前，詹姆斯·沃森（James Watson）在国会上就人类克隆的前景作证时发表了这一声明：“这根本不是科学家的决定”。这是公众的决定-您是否要这样做？'1 1997年，多莉成功克隆后，关于人类胚胎干细胞研究的争论集中在试图回答一个主要问题：政府应否分配联邦政府？促进和帮助资助这种相对较新的科学兴趣的资金？这是一个影响整个社会的问题。如果我们希望遵守沃森的声明，并且我认为应该这样做，那么就必须提出几个问题：（i）我们是否在此问题上考虑了公众的意见？ （ii）是否已向公众提供了急需的工具来理解这一复杂的主题，因此有良心的看法？ （iii）在采用这项新技术所产生的不同问题上，我们应采用何种政治，教育和经济手段达成共识，并获得普遍代表？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号