...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management >Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: limitations and synergies. (Special Issue: Managing ecosystem services and natural capital-trade-offs, synergies and challenges.)
【24h】

Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: limitations and synergies. (Special Issue: Managing ecosystem services and natural capital-trade-offs, synergies and challenges.)

机译：整合生态系统服务与环境规划：局限与协同作用。 （特刊：管理生态系统服务和自然资本的权衡，协同作用和挑战。）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Environmental planning offers an important approach to dealing with the concept of ecosystem services (ESS) in practice. Nonetheless, spatial planning science has failed to connect with the international ESS discussion. Thus, the purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to make relevant environmental planning experience available to ESS researchers; second, to offer conceptual and methodological suggestions for future ESS assessments that consider key insights from European planning science. A systematic literature analysis was used to juxtapose several theoretical and methodological aspects of ESS assessment and environmental planning concepts in order to identify comparative benefits and potentials for an integration of the two approaches. To illustrate the limitations and potentials of the approaches, the example of German landscape planning is described. A better integration of the two approaches has the potential to (i) strengthen the spatial concreteness and scale relation of ESS on low tiers; (ii) foster accounting and monetary valuation in environmental planning, especially for applications on supra-regional scale; (iii) reflect on underlying values in the ESS approach and overcome a latent nature determinism; (iv) more clearly differentiate between public and private goods for better targeting implementation strategies; (v) help in developing context-dependent classification categories that can accommodate all implementation relevant services and relate services to beneficiaries; and (vi) frame communication and participation processes by reflecting their constitutional role in the political decision-making process.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.616534
机译：在实践中，环境规划提供了一种重要的方法来处理生态系统服务（ESS）的概念。但是，空间规划科学未能与国际ESS讨论联系起来。因此，本文的目的是双重的：第一，为ESS研究人员提供相关的环境规划经验。第二，为未来的ESS评估提供概念和方法上的建议，其中应考虑欧洲规划科学的重要见解。系统的文献分析被用来将ESS评估和环境规划概念的几个理论和方法学方面并列，以便确定两种方法整合的比较利益和潜力。为了说明这种方法的局限性和潜力，以德国景观规划为例。两种方法的更好的集成具有以下潜力：（i）加强低层ESS的空间具体性和规模关系; （ii）促进环境规划中的会计和货币估价，尤其是在超区域规模的应用中; （iii）反思ESS方法中的基本价值并克服潜在的自然确定性; （iv）更清楚地区分公共物品和私人物品，以更好地确定目标实施战略; （v）帮助发展与上下文有关的分类类别，以适应所有与实施有关的服务，并使服务与受益人相关; （vi）通过反映其在政治决策过程中的宪法作用来构架沟通和参与过程。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.616534

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号