...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics >Corporate-internal vs. national standard - A comparison study of two ergonomics evaluation procedures used in automotive manufacturing
【24h】

Corporate-internal vs. national standard - A comparison study of two ergonomics evaluation procedures used in automotive manufacturing

机译：公司内部标准与国家标准-汽车制造中两种人体工程学评估程序的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Manufacturing corporations sometimes use corporate-internal procedures to evaluate and monitor the ergonomic status of the workplace. This article describes an industrial case study in the Swedish automotive sector, where an internally developed evaluation procedure was compared with a procedure based on a Swedish national standard provision. It was found that the national standard procedure tended to give more severe ratings and statistical support shows that the two evaluation procedures are not equivalent. The ability of the methods to identify body segments at risk was also compared. The quantitative comparison was followed up with interviews, where the influence of professional tasks and objectives became evident, as well as the fact that evaluation criteria are quantified differently by the two procedures. The main finding is that unforeseen differences in analysis procedure, criteria of acceptability and levels of detail can cause use-related difficulties for different professional groups when methods are used interchangeably. Relevance to industry: Industrial corporations wishing to monitor ergonomics consistently are advised by the authors to ensure that ratings from internal evaluations are interpreted the same way by all involved personnel, and that they at least have criteria levels equivalent to those of a national standard.
机译：制造公司有时会使用公司内部程序来评估和监视工作场所的人体工程学状态。本文介绍了瑞典汽车行业的工业案例研究，将内部开发的评估程序与基于瑞典国家标准规定的程序进行了比较。结果发现，国家标准程序倾向于给出更严格的评级，统计支持表明这两种评估程序并不相同。还比较了确定危险身体部位的方法的能力。在进行定量比较之后，进行了访谈，在访谈中，专业任务和目标的影响变得明显，而且两种程序对评估标准的量化不同。主要发现是，当方法可互换使用时，分析程序，可接受性标准和详细程度的不可预见的差异可能导致不同专业群体的使用相关困难。与行业的相关性：作者建议，希望始终如一地监控人体工程学的工业公司，应确保所有相关人员以相同的方式解释内部评估的等级，并且它们至少具有与国家标准相当的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号