...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of osteopathic medicine: IJOM >Trial comparing manipulation with mobilisation for recent onset neck pain shows no difference of effect for either treatment
【24h】

Trial comparing manipulation with mobilisation for recent onset neck pain shows no difference of effect for either treatment

机译：将操作与动员对近期发作的颈部疼痛进行比较的试验显示，两种疗法的疗效均无差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper by Leaver et al. generated quite a lot of media interest in Australia with some media reports suggesting that cervical spine manipulation (i.e. 'thrust manipulation') may not be appropriate given the increased risk of stroke, when compared to mobilisation of the cervical spine. Neck pain is a common presentation in osteopathic practice and this study sought to compare the effectiveness of mobilisation and manipulation for the management of cervical spine pain. Both techniques are commonly utilised by osteopaths and have been shown to be effective for cervical spine pain, however, there is reported to be a higher risk of stroke and similar events with manipulation.
机译：莱弗等人的这篇论文。在澳大利亚引起了很多媒体的关注，一些媒体报道表明，与动员颈椎相比，考虑到中风的风险增加，颈椎操纵（即“推力操纵”）可能不适合。颈部疼痛是整骨疗法中的常见表现，本研究旨在比较动员和操作对控制颈椎疼痛的有效性。两种技术都被整骨者普遍采用，并已显示出对颈椎疼痛有效，但是，据报道中风的风险更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号