【24h】

Managing sponsored research rewards to industry and universities

机译:管理对行业和大学的赞助研究奖励

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since the passing of the Bayh Dole Act in 1980, industry sponsorship of research in the USA has been a successful platform upon which universities have been able to commercialise research outcomes. In doing so universities have realised commercial income from their research outcomes, by then licensing those research outcomes to industry partners. Universities in other countries, including Australia, want to emulate that success, and in part have attempted to do so by adopting the same reward models for relationships with industry partners that are employed in the USA. These efforts have sometimes had only marginal success. This has been so because Australia and other countries do not have the same legal framework and environment as the USA, and this affects the indiscriminate use of US reward models in other countries. This raises the challenge in other countries for more inventive reward models for relationships with industry to be developed. This paper examines three reward models: offering to industry sponsors an option to negotiate an exclusive license; the joint ownership of research outcomes; and assignment to the industry sponsor of research outcomes, and assesses the use of each of these models in Australia, a country with a different legal framework and environment to that in the USA. [References: 21]
机译:自1980年通过《 Bayh Dole法案》以来,美国对研究的行业赞助一直是大学成功地将研究成果商业化的成功平台。通过这样做,大学通过将研究成果许可给行业合作伙伴,从而从研究成果中获得商业收益。包括澳大利亚在内的其他国家的大学都希望效仿这种成功,并且在某种程度上尝试通过采用与美国雇用的行业合作伙伴相同的奖励模式来做到这一点。这些努力有时仅取得很小的成功。之所以如此,是因为澳大利亚和其他国家/地区的法律框架和环境与美国不同,这影响了在其他国家/地区滥用美国奖励模式的情况。这就给其他国家带来了挑战,那就是要为与行业的关系开发更具创造性的奖励模型。本文研究了三种奖励模式:向行业赞助商提供协商独家许可的选项;研究成果的共同所有权;并分配给研究成果的行业赞助商,并评估在澳大利亚的法律框架和环境与美国不同的国家/地区使用这些模型的情况。 [参考:21]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号