...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Technology Management: The Journal of the Technology Management of Technology, Engineering Management, Technology Policy and Strategy >Emerging digital technology as a window of opportunity and technological leapfrogging: catch-up in digital TV by the Korean firms
【24h】

Emerging digital technology as a window of opportunity and technological leapfrogging: catch-up in digital TV by the Korean firms

机译：新兴的数字技术是机遇和技术跨越的窗口：韩国公司追赶数字电视

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper has examined the leapfrogging thesis with the case of catch-up in digital TV by the Korean firms. Despite the disadvantages implied by the technological regime of digital TV and the risks facing early entrants in trajectory choice and initial market formation, the Korean firms had achieved a 'path-creating catch-up' in the sense they chose a different path from the forerunning Japanese firms. As they have been closely watching the technological trends and the standard setting process, there was less risk of choosing the right or wrong technological trajectory. Also, despite the lack of sufficient capability and core knowledge base, the Korean firms had some complementary asset, such as the experience of producing analogue TV, and were able to develop the prototype digital TV and the ASIC chips, given the accesses to the foreign knowledge via overseas R&D posts and acquisition of a foreign company. To secure the initial market size, the Korean targeted the US market from the beginning, and their sources for competitive advantages were the speedy setting up the production system for mass production of products at the initial stage. The initial failure of the Japanese firms and the success of the Korean firms do suggest that the period of paradigm shift, like this toward digital technology, can serve as a window of opportunity for latecomers while penalising the forerunner.
机译：本文以韩国企业追赶数字电视为例，研究了跨越式的论文。尽管数字电视技术体制隐含着劣势，以及早期进入者在轨迹选择和初始市场形成方面面临的风险，但韩国企业在选择与前者不同的道路上实现了“创举追赶”日本公司。由于他们一直密切关注技术趋势和标准制定过程，因此选择正确或错误的技术轨迹的风险较小。此外，尽管缺乏足够的能力和核心知识基础，但韩国公司仍具有一些互补资产，例如生产模拟电视的经验，并且能够在获得国外许可的情况下开发数字电视原型和ASIC芯片。通过海外研发岗位和收购外国公司获得知识。为了确保最初的市场规模，韩国人从一开始就瞄准了美国市场，其竞争优势的来源是在最初阶段迅速建立了用于批量生产产品的生产系统。日本公司最初的失败和韩国公司的成功确实表明，范式转变时期，例如向数字技术的转变，可以为后进者提供机会之窗，同时惩罚先行者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号