• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Technology Management: The Journal of the Technology Management of Technology, Engineering Management, Technology Policy and Strategy >Knowledge management at a branchpoint: will we ignore the lessons of the Al discipline the way it ignored the lessons of Ludwig Wittgenstein?
【24h】

Knowledge management at a branchpoint: will we ignore the lessons of the Al discipline the way it ignored the lessons of Ludwig Wittgenstein?

机译：分支机构的知识管理：我们会像忽略路德维希·维特根斯坦的课程那样，忽略Al学科的课程吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We possess a rich philosophical legacy around the composition and function of mind. Ludwig Wittgenstein in particular, and Michael Polanyi, have enabled a modern definition of mind as an unknowable, inaccessible, indescribable, unmodellable, inarticulable corpus of connections, with a holistic rather than a heuristic composition. This entity I term 'thought-pattern', our evolving weltanschauung which is driven by empirical episodes and which is chaotic, complex, open, inferential, adaptive, self-organizing, and emergent. The artificial intelligence discipline, for many years, ignored the obvious fallacies in their work which their philosophical forebears bequeathed them land which would have led them to a definition such as the one above) and soldiered on uselessly. The knowledge management discipline is poised to be victim to the same fallacies, inherited now from both Wittgenstein and the Al fraternity. Our emphasis on defined processes to govern behaviour, on learning as a discrete activity, on the modellability of knowledge structures, on physical artefacts as representations of knowledge (supplanting dialogue), and on acquisitive over inquisitive behaviour, will undermine rather than enhance our organizational learning posture and reflect the same hubris that afflicted the Al discipline. We can reverse this trend in our organizations by turning away from 'solutions' to largely unstated problems and focusing instead on fundamental values like heterogeneity, empowerment, enabling people, providing opportunities for interaction, nurturing nascent communities, and sharing. [References: 217]
机译：我们在思维的组成和功能方面拥有丰富的哲学遗产。尤其是路德维格·维特根斯坦（Ludwig Wittgenstein）和迈克尔·波兰尼（Michael Polanyi），使思维的现代定义成为了一种不可知，难以接近，难以形容，无法建模，难以言说的联系语料库，具有整体而非启发式的构成。我将这个实体称为“思想模式”，这是我们不断发展的weltanschauung，它由经验事件驱动，是混乱，复杂，开放，推论，适应性，自组织和紧急的。多年来，人工智能学科一直忽略了其工作中显而易见的谬论，即他们的哲学先辈遗赠了他们的土地，这将导致他们做出上述定义，而毫无用处。知识管理学科准备成为同样的谬论的受害者，这些谬论现在从维特根斯坦和艾尔兄弟会继承。我们强调管理行为的既定流程，作为离散活动的学习，知识结构的可建模性，作为知识表示的物理制品（替代对话）以及对获取性行为的习得性，将破坏而不是增强我们的组织学习能力摆姿势并反映出困扰Al学科的同样的傲慢态度。我们可以通过从“解决方案”转向基本上未说明的问题，而专注于基本价值（如异质性，授权，使人，提供互动机会，培育新生社区和共享），来扭转组织中的这一趋势。 [参考：217]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号