...
【24h】

Cost-effective use of evaluation models: an empirical cross-national investigation

机译:具有成本效益的使用评估模型:经验性跨国调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the existence of methodologically sound evaluation models for infrastructure projects, it is far from certain if these methods are used at all. In fact, political motives seem often to play a more important role when it comes to 'real decision-making'. This paper provides an answer to the question why certain evaluation methods are used as the basis to allocate funds and others are not, even if they are qualitatively of high standing. The evaluation methods used in six different countries and corresponding authorities (France, Germany. Switzerland, Netherlands, UK and the MTC/Bay Area) have been analysed. As a result, seven explanatory factors which determine the effective use of appraisal methods have been derived: range of different criteria, understanding and dispersion, contributions of lower government tiers, contribution of pressure groups, agreement among actors on usage, flexibility of usage, and legal recognition. A country-specific discussion is carried out in terms of these seven factors. The paper closes with a cross national comparison and practical considerations for successful implementation of evaluation methods. [References: 35]
机译:尽管存在基础设施项目在方法论上合理的评估模型,但是否完全使用这些方法仍不确定。实际上,当涉及到“真正的决策”时,政治动机似乎常常扮演着更重要的角色。本文为以下问题提供了答案:为什么某些评估方法被用作分配资金的基础,而另一些却没有,即使它们在质量上具有很高的声誉。已经分析了六个不同国家和相应机构(法国,德国,瑞士,荷兰,英国和MTC /湾区)使用的评估方法。结果,得出了确定评估方法有效使用的七个解释性因素:不同标准的范围,理解和分散,下级政府的贡献,压力团体的贡献,行为者之间就使用达成的共识,使用的灵活性以及法律认可。针对这七个因素进行了针对特定国家的讨论。本文以跨国比较和成功实施评估方法的实际考虑作为结尾。 [参考:35]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号