• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological engineering: The Journal of Ecotechnology >Greenwall classification and critical design-management assessments
【24h】

Greenwall classification and critical design-management assessments

机译：绿墙分类和关键设计管理评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

greenwall research can promote wider applications in cities to contribute to climate-change adaptation and ameliorate the urban heat island effect. The accumulated knowledge and experience can be organized and assessed to foster further research and better practise. Two greenwall types provide the analytic framework based on plant growth form as the overarching criterion, namely the mechanically-dependent climber (CGW) and mechanically-independent herb-shrub (HGW). The intrinsic and extrinsic wall factors, subsumed under structural, surface, dimension, geometry, location, and ambience, determine the vertical-habitat foundation to receive vegetation. The comprehensive greenwall design factors provide a structured assessment. CGW has four design factors, including climbing, air gap, substrate, and vegetation. The more elaborate HGW has five design factors, including substrate, container, air gap, water-nutrient, and vegetation. With justifications related to existing state of classification and terminology, a triple-criteria greenwall classification scheme is proposed. Adopting the key criteria of training-system and wall toe substrate, CGW are split into 16 subtypes. For HGW, the substrate-system and elevated-substrate criteria identify 8 subtypes. The representative CGW and HGW subtypes are depicted in concise diagrams. The systematic classification can inform greenwall designers to determine and plan for the preferred subtype. The pros and cons of CGW and HGW are compared based on 35 key designs and management issues to optimize matching greenwall choice with expectation, preference, and site potentials and limitations. The findings provide practical hints to enhance greenwall management. The greenwall nomenclature package is recommended to facilitate scientific communication. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译：绿墙的研究可以促进城市中更广泛的应用，从而为适应气候变化做出贡献并改善城市的热岛效应。可以组织和评估积累的知识和经验，以促进进一步的研究和更好的实践。两种绿墙类型提供了基于植物生长形式作为总体判据的分析框架，即机械依赖的攀登植物（CGW）和机械独立的草本灌木（HGW）。包含在结构，表面，尺寸，几何形状，位置和环境下的内在和外在墙壁因素决定了接收植被的垂直栖息地基础。全面的绿墙设计因素提供了结构化的评估。 CGW具有四个设计因素，包括爬坡，气隙，基质和植被。更详细的HGW具有五个设计因素，包括基材，容器，气隙，水养分和植被。结合现有分类和术语状态的合理性，提出了一种三标准绿墙分类方案。根据训练系统和脚趾底物的关键标准，CGW被分为16个亚型。对于HGW，底物系统和高底物标准可确定8种亚型。简洁的示意图描述了代表性的CGW和HGW子类型。系统的分类可以通知绿墙设计人员确定和计划首选的子类型。根据35个关键设计和管理问题，对CGW和HGW的优缺点进行了比较，以优化具有期望，偏好以及站点潜力和局限性的绿墙选择。研究结果为加强绿墙管理提供了实用提示。建议使用绿墙命名法包，以促进科学交流。 （C）2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号