...
首页> 外文期刊>Educational and Psychological Measurement >Understanding the Relation Between Attitude Involvement and Response Latitude Using Item Response Theory
【24h】

Understanding the Relation Between Attitude Involvement and Response Latitude Using Item Response Theory

机译:用项目反应理论理解态度参与和反应纬度之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Adapting the original latitude of acceptance concept to Likert-type surveys, response latitudes are defined as the range of graded response options a person is willing to endorse. Response latitudes were expected to relate to attitude involvement such that high involvement was linked to narrow latitudes (the result of selective, careful responding) and low involvement was linked to wide latitudes (the result of disinterested, careless responding). In an innovative application of item response theory, parameters from Samejima's graded response model were used to examine response latitude width. Other item response theory-based tools (e.g., test characteristic curves, information functions) were used to examine the influence of response latitudes on the psychometric functioning of several attitude surveys. A mix of experimental and nonexperimental methods was employed to create groups of high and low involvement surveys. Comparisons of these surveys showed that high involvement was related to significantly narrower response latitudes than low involvement. Furthermore, wide response latitudes were related to unfavorable psychometric properties such as reduced survey discrimination and reduced internal validity relative to narrow latitudes. Comparisons of information functions in high and low involvement conditions, however, were less consistent. Implications of wide response latitudes are quite unfavorable for researchers and suggest that an element of error is present when respondents feel little involvement with an attitude topic.
机译:将接受的原始纬度概念适应李克特式调查,将响应纬度定义为一个人愿意认可的分级响应选项的范围。预期反应纬度与态度参与有关,因此高度参与与狭窄纬度有关(选择性,认真响应的结果),而低参与与广泛纬度有关(无私,粗心的响应结果)。在项目响应理论的创新应用中,使用Samejima分级响应模型的参数来检查响应纬度宽度。其他基于项目反应理论的工具(例如,测试特征曲线,信息功能)用于检查反应纬度对几种态度调查的心理测验功能的影响。采用实验和非实验方法的组合来创建高参与度调查和低参与度调查的组。这些调查的比较表明,与低参与度相比,高参与度与响应范围明显狭窄有关。此外,广泛的反应纬度与不利的心理测量特性有关,例如相对于狭窄的纬度而言,减少了调查歧视和降低了内部效度。但是,在高和低参与条件下的信息功能比较并不一致。对于研究人员来说,广泛的反应范围是非常不利的,并且表明当受访者很少参与态度主题时,就会出现错误因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号