• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Educational and Psychological Measurement >Comparability of TOEFL CBT essay prompts: Response-mode analyses
【24h】

Comparability of TOEFL CBT essay prompts: Response-mode analyses

机译：TOEFL CBT文章提示的可比性：响应模式分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Eighty-three Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) writing prompts administered via computer-based testing between July 1998 and August 2000 were examined for differences attributable to the response mode (handwriting or word processing) chosen by examinees. Differences were examined statistically using polytomous logistic regression. A variable measuring English-language ability (ELA) was developed from the multiple-choice components of the TOEFL and used as a matching variable. Although there was little observed difference in mean writing scores, when examinees were matched on ELA, small differences were observed in effect sizes consistently favoring the handwriting response mode. This difference favoring the handwriting response mode occurred for all of the writing prompts analyzed, suggesting a general effect for response mode. Differences for individual writing prompts were small, however.
机译：对1998年7月至2000年8月之间通过计算机测试进行的八十三次英语作为外语测试（TOEFL）的写作提示进行了检查，以找出与应试者选择的回答方式（手写或文字处理）有关的差异。使用多对数逻辑回归分析统计差异。从TOEFL的多项选择成分中开发出了一种衡量英语能力（ELA）的变量，并将其用作匹配变量。尽管观察到的平均写作分数几乎没有差异，但当考生在ELA上进行匹配时，观察到的效应大小差异很小，始终偏向于手写响应模式。在分析的所有书写提示中都出现了有利于手写响应模式的差异，这表明响应模式具有一般效果。但是，个人写作提示的差异很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号