• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Educational and Psychological Measurement >Reliability generalization of the revised children's manifest anxiety scale
【24h】

Reliability generalization of the revised children's manifest anxiety scale

机译：修订后的儿童明显焦虑量表的可靠性归纳

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A reliability generalization of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS) was conducted using the normative sample. The RCMAS consists of a Total Anxiety scale as well as four subcales. Results suggest that the Total Anxiety scores are typically reliable (median alpha across 48 samples = .81). Subscale scores were less reliable: The median alpha coefficients were .61 for the Physiological subscale, .63 for the Concentration subscale, .77 for the Worry A Oversensitivity subscale, and .72 for the Lie subscale. Hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that score variability, age, race, and mean score were statistically significant predictors of reliability across scales although effects were variable and often, but not always, small. The predictive power of score variability is consistent with psychometric theory, but focused psychometric analyses are needed to isolate the unique and interactive impact of age, race, and mean score on RCMAS scale score reliability estimates, especially the Lie subscale.
机译：使用标准样本对修订后的儿童明显焦虑量表（RCMAS）进行了可靠性归纳。 RCMAS由总焦虑量表和四个子量表组成。结果表明，总焦虑评分通常是可靠的（48个样本的中位阿尔法值= 0.81）。子量表的分数不太可靠：生理子量表的Alpha系数中位数为0.61，浓度子量表的Alpha系数中位数为0.63，担心超敏感度子量表的Alpha系数中位数为0.77，Lie子量表的Alpha系数中值为0.72。分层回归分析表明，尽管影响是可变的，并且通常（但并不总是）很小，但评分变异性，年龄，种族和平均评分在各个量表上都是可靠性的统计显着预测指标。分数变异性的预测能力与心理计量学理论是一致的，但是需要集中的心理计量学分析来隔离年龄，种族和平均分数对RCMAS量表评分可靠性估计，尤其是Lie子量表的独特和互动影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号