首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science and Technology Library >Economic prehistory or environmental archaeology? On gaining sense of identity
【24h】

Economic prehistory or environmental archaeology? On gaining sense of identity

机译:经济史前史还是环境考古学?关于获得认同感

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Environmental archaeology variously presents itself as a methodology, as a form of palaeogeography, and as an ecological study. This ongoing debate within the discipline has led to uncertainty about the place of the discipline and its relationship with other studies within and without archaeology. A preoccupation with human habitat has inhibited the development of a theoretical framework that fully integrates environmental archaeology with related disciplines. The niche concept enables such a theoretical development, and the concepts of fundamental and realised niche allow the interplay of cultural and environmental constraints to be explicitly modelled. Archaeology should assert itself as a discipline that seeks to explain present-day physical and cultural landscapes, and should be more actively engaged in ecosystem conservation.
机译:环境考古学以一种方法论,一种古地理学形式以及一种生态学研究的形式出现。该学科内部的这种持续争论导致对该学科的位置及其与考古学内外的其他研究之间的关系产生不确定性。对人类栖息地的关注导致了理论框架的发展,该理论框架将环境考古学与相关学科完全整合在一起。生态位概念使这种理论得以发展,而基本生态位和已实现生态位的概念使文化和环境约束的相互作用得以明确建模。考古学应坚持自己的学科,以解释当今的自然和文化景观,并应更积极地参与生态系统的保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号