...
首页> 外文期刊>European eating disorders review >A practical comparison of two types of family intervention: An exploratory RCT of family day workshops and individual family work as a supplement to inpatient care for adults with anorexia nervosa
【24h】

A practical comparison of two types of family intervention: An exploratory RCT of family day workshops and individual family work as a supplement to inpatient care for adults with anorexia nervosa

机译:两种类型的家庭干预的实用比较:家庭日研讨会和个人家庭工作的探索性RCT,作为神经性厌食症成人住院治疗的补充

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Little is known about the outcome of involving families in the treatment of adults with anorexia nervosa. Carers of people with anorexia nervosa experience significant levels of distress. This may contribute to unhelpful behaviours which maintain the illness. Aims To evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of family workshops with educational and skills-based components as compared to individual family work. Method An exploratory randomised controlled trial of two forms of family intervention was conducted for inpatients with anorexia nervosa (n=48) and their family members on a specialised unit for adults. Results In both groups, there was an improvement in patients' BMI and a reduction in carers' distress. There were no differences between groups. Conclusion Preliminary findings suggest that workshop-based intervention with two families might be as effective as an individually focused family intervention. This may offer a more cost-effective intervention for this treatment-resistant group.
机译:背景技术关于让家庭参与成人神经性厌食症治疗的结果知之甚少。具有神经性厌食症的人的照护者经历着很大程度的困扰。这可能导致维持疾病的无助行为。目的评估与个人家庭工作相比具有教育和技能基础的家庭工作坊的有效性和可接受性。方法对成人神经性厌食症患者(n = 48)及其家属进行了一项探索性随机对照试验,分为两种形式的家庭干预。结果两组患者的BMI均得到改善,护理人员的痛苦有所减轻。组之间没有差异。结论初步发现表明,对两个家庭进行的基于研讨会的干预措施与针对个人的家庭干预措施一样有效。这可能为该耐药性人群提供更具成本效益的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号