• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Genewatch : >Incidental Findings and Informed Consent
【24h】

Incidental Findings and Informed Consent

机译：偶然发现和知情同意

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

GeneWatch: I think even the people involved in writing or approving the ACMG recommendations must have known they were pretty bold. Was there anything in them that particularly surprised you?George Annas: The main thing that surprised me is that they want to do away with informed consent. Actually, that didn't surprise me, it shocked me. There's no reason to do that. The medical profession gets to set the standard of care; they do not get to say whether patients can refuse treatment. That's done by the law. It's not a matter left to physicians. Even if a physician knows exactly how to save your life, the physician can't do it unless you agree.
机译：GeneWatch：我认为即使是参与撰写或批准ACMG建议的人员也必须知道他们相当大胆。他们中有什么让您特别感到惊讶的吗？乔治·安纳斯（George Annas）：让我感到惊讶的主要是，他们希望取消知情同意。实际上，这并不令我感到惊讶，这让我感到震惊。没有理由这样做。医学界必须制定护理标准;他们没有说患者是否可以拒绝治疗。这是法律规定的。这不是医师要做的事情。即使医师确切知道如何拯救您的生命，除非您同意，否则医师无法做到这一点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号