...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Georgetown Journal of International Law >'O, PRIVACY' CANADA'S IMPORTANCE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL DATA PRIVACY REGIME
【24h】

'O, PRIVACY' CANADA'S IMPORTANCE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL DATA PRIVACY REGIME

机译：“ O，隐私”在国际数据隐私制度发展中的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As e-commerce and international outsourcing rapidly expands, the governments of the leading Western industrial nations are making every effort to balance protection of their citizens' personal information with governmental interests in national security and promotion of commercial competitiveness. A continuously developing body of international law - to which we refer as the International Data Privacy (IDP) regime - attempts to reconcile the rights and conduct of the three major actors in this regime: governments, businesses, and individuals whose information is gathered, stored or traded. Famously, Europe and the United States have drastically different notions of what constitutes the proper balance of rights and responsibilities of the three actors, and approaches to achieving that balance. On the one hand, European governments are focused on protecting their citizens' privacy and ensuring that those individuals have enough faith in the safety of the international system to freely engage in commerce, especially e-commerce. On the other hand, national security concerns in the United States, particularly after September 11, 2001, push the limits of civil rights such as privacy in order to satisfy the State's duty to protect its citizens. Canada has traditionally taken a middle-of-the-road approach to this cross-Atlantic divide.
机译：随着电子商务和国际外包的迅速发展，西方主要工业国家的政府正在尽一切努力在保护公民的个人信息与政府在国家安全和促进商业竞争力方面的利益之间取得平衡。一个不断发展的国际法体系（我们称之为国际数据隐私（IDP）制度）试图调和该制度中三个主要行为者的权利和行为：政府，企业和收集，存储信息的个人或交易。著名的是，欧洲和美国对于什么构成三个行为者的权利和责任的适当平衡以及实现这种平衡的方法有着截然不同的概念。一方面，欧洲各国政府致力于保护其公民的隐私，并确保这些人对国际体系的安全性有足够的信心，以自由地从事贸易，特别是电子商务。另一方面，特别是在2001年9月11日之后，美国在国家安全方面的担忧推动了诸如隐私之类的民权限制，以履行国家保护其公民的责任。传统上，加拿大采取了跨大西洋的跨界方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号