...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Workplace-based assessment for general practitioners: using stakeholder perception to aid blueprinting of an assessment battery.
【24h】

Workplace-based assessment for general practitioners: using stakeholder perception to aid blueprinting of an assessment battery.

机译：针对全科医生的基于工作场所的评估：利用利益相关者的看法来帮助评估电池组的蓝图。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Context The implementation of an assessment system may be facilitated by stakeholder agreement that appropriate qualities are being tested. This study investigated the extent to which stakeholders perceived 8 assessment formats (multiple-choice questions, objective structured clinical examination, video, significant event analysis, criterion audit, multi-source feedback, case analysis and patient satisfaction questionnaire) as able to assess varying qualities of doctors training in UK general practice. Methods Educationalists, general practice trainers and registrars completed a blueprinting style of exercise to rate the extent to which each evaluation format was perceived to assess each of 8 competencies derived primarily from the General Medical Council document Good Medical Practice. Results There were high levels of agreement among stakeholders regarding the perceived qualities tested by the proposed formats (G = 0.82-0.93). Differences were found in participants' perceptions of how well qualities were able to be assessed and in the ability of the respective formats to test each quality. Multi-source feedback (MSF) was expected to assess a wide range of qualities, whereas Probity, Health and Ability to work with colleagues were limited in terms of how well they could be tested by the proposed formats. Discussion Awareness of the perceptions of stakeholders should facilitate the development and implementation of workplace-based assessment (WPBA) systems. These data shed light on the acceptability of various formats in a way that will inform further investigation of WPBA formats' validity and feasibility, while also providing evidence on which to base educational efforts regarding the value of each format.
机译：上下文利益相关者同意可以对适当的质量进行测试，可以促进评估系统的实施。这项研究调查了利益相关者认为8种评估格式（多项选择题，客观结构化临床检查，视频，重大事件分析，标准审核，多源反馈，案例分析和患者满意度问卷调查）能够评估不同质量的程度。在英国全科医学培训的医生。方法教育学家，全科医师和注册服务员完成了锻炼的蓝图样式，以评估人们认为每种评估格式评估主要来自总医务委员会文件《良好医疗实践》的8种能力的程度。结果利益相关者之间对拟议格式测试的感知质量达成了高度共识（G = 0.82-0.93）。在参与者对质量评估能力的看法以及相应格式测试每种质量的能力方面存在差异。预期多源反馈（MSF）可以评估广泛的质量，而在通过提议的格式对它们进行测试的能力方面，诚实，健康和与同事合作的能力受到限制。讨论意识到利益相关者的看法应有助于基于工作场所的评估（WPBA）系统的开发和实施。这些数据以某种方式阐明了各种格式的可接受性，这将为进一步研究WPBA格式的有效性和可行性提供依据，同时也提供了根据每种格式的价值进行教育努力的依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号