首页> 外文期刊>Medical teacher >Weighting checklist items and station components on a large-scale OSCE: Is it worth the effort?
【24h】

Weighting checklist items and station components on a large-scale OSCE: Is it worth the effort?

机译:在大型OSCE上加权清单项目和站点组件:是否值得付出努力?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Past research suggests that the use of externally-applied scoring weights may not appreciably impact measurement qualities such as reliability or validity. Nonetheless, some credentialing boards and academic institutions apply differential scoring weights based on expert opinion about the relative importance of individual items or test components of Observed Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs).
机译:背景:过去的研究表明,使用外部应用的计分权重可能不会明显影响测量质量,例如可靠性或有效性。尽管如此,一些认证委员会和学术机构还是根据专家对观察到的结构化临床考试(OSCE)的单个项目或测试成分的相对重要性的不同意见,应用不同的评分权重。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号