• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine, health care, and philosophy >Declarations, accusations and judgement: examining conflict of interest discourses as performative speech-acts
【24h】

Declarations, accusations and judgement: examining conflict of interest discourses as performative speech-acts

机译：声明，指控和判断：将利益冲突话语视为表演性言语行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Concerns over conflicts of interest (COI) in academic research and medical practice continue to provoke a great deal of discussion. What is most obvious in this discourse is that when COIs are declared, or perceived to exist in others, there is a focus on both the descriptive question of whether there is a COI and, subsequently, the normative question of whether it is good, bad or neutral. We contend, however, that in addition to the descriptive and normative, COI declarations and accusations can be understood as performatives. In this article, we apply J.L. Austin's performative speech-act theory to COI discourses and illustrate how this works using a contemporary case study of COI in biomedical publishing. We argue that using Austin's theory of performative speech-acts serves to highlight the social arrangements and role of authorities in COI discourse and so provides a rich framework to examine declarations, accusations and judgements of COI that often arise in the context of biomedical research and practice.
机译：对学术研究和医学实践中的利益冲突（COI）的担忧继续引起大量讨论。在本篇文章中，最明显的是，当宣布COI或认为COI存在于其他COI中时，既要关注描述是否存在COI的问题，也要关注其是否好，坏的规范性问题。或中立。但是，我们认为，除了描述性和规范性之外，COI声明和指控也可以理解为表演性的。在本文中，我们将J.L. Austin的表演性言语行为理论应用于COI话语，并使用当代在生物医学出版领域的COI案例研究来说明这种工作原理。我们认为，使用奥斯丁的表演性言语行为理论可突出显示COI话语中的社会安排和当局的作用，从而提供了一个丰富的框架来检查在生物医学研究和实践中经常出现的COI的声明，指控和判断。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号