• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Mental health and social inclusion >Recovery, turning points and forensics: views from the ward in an English high secure facility
【24h】

Recovery, turning points and forensics: views from the ward in an English high secure facility

机译：恢复，转折点和取证：英国高安全设施中病房的意见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - The authors offer up an example of recovery in a high-secure setting. The purpose of this paper is to highlight how an individual account of recovery and the academic literature offer up related and important perspectives that have serious clinical utility. Design/methodology/approach - First the context is outlined. The biographical account is then deployed to describe the experience of being detained in an English high-secure facility using recovery as a framework for elucidation. This is often referred to in recovery as accessing the views of the "expert by experience". In a thematic way this author details his understanding of recovery, what worked and what did not. This account is then contrasted with the academic literature and research at the same site. Social anthropology acts as the theoretical backdrop. This debate informs some clinical implications and issues for practice. Findings - Recovery can be a highly relevant concept in a high-secure context. The author found that the biographical account of the upatient" can offer the observer some insights for practice. The authors noted that the collective themes of previous research where consistent to this account. The authors found the use of recovery principles helped the person receiving care fulfil his potential. Nevertheless, forensic recovery implies a forensic past. This complicates recovery and placed limits on the own use of the principles. Social implications - The authors argue that recovery is highly relevant to the context and particularly important to people who are often stigmatized for multiple reasons including their, "illness", their "crime", and their social situation. The paper implies that forensic recovery is more problematic than mainstream recovery. Key events mark out issues. Originality/value - This is the first co-produced paper surrounding recovery in high-secure care.
机译：目的-作者提供了在高安全性环境中进行恢复的示例。本文的目的是强调个人恢复情况和学术文献如何提供具有重要临床实用性的相关和重要观点。设计/方法/方法-首先概述上下文。然后，使用传记来描述使用恢复作为说明框架在英国高安全设施中被拘留的经历。在恢复中，这通常被称为访问“经验专家”的观点。作者以主题方式详细介绍了他对恢复的理解，有效的方法和无效的方法。然后将此说明与同一站点上的学术文献和研究进行对比。社会人类学是理论背景。这场辩论提供了一些临床意义和实践问题。结果-在高度安全的环境中，恢复可能是一个高度相关的概念。作者发现，“患者的传记记录”可以为观察者提供一些实践上的见解。作者指出，以前的研究的集体主题与此观点相符。作者发现，使用康复原则有助于接受护理的人实现法医的康复意味着法医的过去，这使康复变得很复杂，并限制了自己对这些原则的使用社会意义-作者认为，康复与背景高度相关，对于经常被污名化的人尤其重要包括“疾病”，“犯罪”和社会状况在内的多种原因，本文暗示法医恢复比主流恢复更具问题，关键事件标出了问题，原创性/价值-这是第一份共同发表的论文高安全性护理中的周围康复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号