首页> 外文期刊>Mining Engineering >Nonfuel minerals projections-why they were wrong
【24h】

Nonfuel minerals projections-why they were wrong

机译:非燃料矿物预测-为什么错了

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article revisits global projections made in 1981 of eight metallic and fertilizer minerals for the year 2000. The objectives here are to quantify the differences between the projected and observed levels of consumption for the year 2000 for eight of the 26 nonfuel minerals covered in the earlier study. An attempt is then made to attribute these (often) large differences to the major determinants of minerals demand - income, technological, regulatory and other policy changes, and changes in the recycling rates of the metallic minerals. The eight minerals covered are aluminum, copper, iron, mercury, nickel, phosphate rock, potash and tin. This summary article presents the actual population, gross domestic product (GDP) and per capita GDP changes from 1970 to 2000, compared with the projected rates for these important determinants of mineral use, along with the observed growth rates of minerals consumption for the eight nonfuel minerals included in this study. When the projections are compared with the observed global consumption levels for the year 2000, the differences range from +43 percent for nickel to +229 percent for potash.
机译:本文回顾了1981年对2000年的八种金属和化肥矿物的全球预测。此处的目的是量化2000年以前的26种非燃料矿物中的八种在2000年的预计和观察到的消费水平之间的差异。研究。然后尝试将这些(通常)较大的差异归因于矿物需求的主要决定因素-收入,技术,法规和其他政策变化以及金属矿物的回收率变化。覆盖的八种矿物是铝,铜,铁,汞,镍,磷矿,钾肥和锡。这篇总结性文章介绍了1970年至2000年的实际人口,国内生产总值(GDP)和人均GDP的变化,并与这些重要的矿物使用决定因素的预计增长率进行了比较,以及观察到的八种非燃料的矿物消耗增长率本研究中包括的矿物质。当将预测值与观察到的2000年全球消费水平进行比较时,镍的差异为+ 43%,钾肥的差异为+ 229%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号