• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Mineral Planning >Linshaws Quarry refusal
【24h】

Linshaws Quarry refusal

机译：Lin是AWS quarry refusal

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In June the Peak District National Park Authority refused permission for the extraction of sandstone tilestone at Linshaws Quarry, Dunford. In 2001 the Authority was minded to approve the application (see Mineral Planning 89 p. 15). The Secretary of State was subsequently notified and his response was received on 20 March. The Secretary of State noted that the planning application at Linshaws Quarry was submitted on 29 February 2000 and that English Nature and English Heritage only recently decided to prepare a joint statement on it. English Nature indicated that this statement should be completed by the end of March 2002 and should include an agreed recommendation on the way forward to avoid Ministerial intervention or a public inquiry. "In view of the purpose of this joint statement and the inordinate length of time that this application has already been under consideration, the Secretary of State has decided that its preparation should not delay his decision on whether or not this application should be called in." The Secretary of State took into account the fact that the proposed development would cover a very small part of the Peak District Moors SPA and the South Pennine Moors cSAC (just 0.99 ha) and concluded that, on balance, any potential conflict with national planning policy was not sufficient to justify his intervention. The Direction issued to the National Park Authority in pursuance of regulation 49(6) of the Habitats Regulations and Article 14 of the GDPO was withdrawn.
机译：6月，峰区国家公园管理局拒绝了在邓福德的林肖（Linshaws）采石场开采砂岩瓷砖的许可。 2001年，授权管理局批准该申请（请参见《矿物规划》第89页第15页）。随后通知了国务卿，并于3月20日收到了他的答复。国务卿指出，Linshaws采石场的规划申请于2000年2月29日提交，英国自然和英国遗产直到最近才决定就此发表一份联合声明。 English Nature表示，该声明应在2002年3月底之前完成，并应就避免部长级干预或公开询问的未来发展方向提出一项议定的建议。 “鉴于这份联合声明的目的以及已经在考虑该申请的时间过长，国务卿已决定其准备工作不应拖延其是否应召回该申请的决定。 ”国务卿考虑到以下事实：拟议的开发项目将涵盖峰区高沼地SPA和南彭宁高地cSAC（仅0.99公顷）的很小一部分，并得出结论，总的来说，与国家规划政策的任何潜在冲突不足以证明他的干预是正确的。撤消了根据《人居条例》第49（6）条和《美国国家保护条例》第14条发布给国家公园管理局的指示。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Mineral Planning》 |2002年第92期|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 矿物学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号