【24h】

Validity of Self-Reported Pedometer Steps per Day in College Students

机译:每天自我报告计步器在大学生中的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this article was to examine the validity of self-reported pedometer steps/day. Forty-seven participants were provided a New Lifestyles NL-2000 (NL-2000; Lees Summit, MO, USA) pedometer and a physical activity (PA) diary for 3 weeks, but not informed of the data-storing capabilities. For weeks 2 and 3, each participant was given a step goal of 3,000 steps/day above week 1 average. A 2 × 3 repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine differences between reported steps/day. Bland-Altman plots assessed the mean bias and limits of agreement between reporting methods. Mean self-reported and NL-2000 steps/day were 9,264 ± 3,555 and 8,971 ± 3,590 steps/day (n = 26, p > .05). Mean biases were 216 ± 1,753 (week 1), -506 ± 1,355 (week 2), and -590 ± 1,360 (week 3) steps/day. Negative mean bias values indicate higher self-reported steps/day. Mean steps/day were similar between recording methods, but large differences were observed among individuals, suggesting self-reported steps/day may be valid for PA research at the population level, but not the individual level.
机译:本文的目的是要检查每天自我报告的计步器步数的有效性。向47位参与者提供了3周的New Lifestyles NL-2000(NL-2000; Lees Summit,美国密苏里州)计步器和体力活动(PA)日记,为期3周,但未告知其数据存储能力。对于第2周和第3周,每个参与者的步伐目标是比第1周平均水平高3,000步/天。使用2×3重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)来检查每天报告的步骤之间的差异。 Bland-Altman图评估了报告方法之间的平均偏差和一致性极限。自我报告的平均水平和NL-2000步/日分别为9,264±3,555和8,971±3,590步/日(n = 26,p> .05)。平均偏差为216±1,753(第1周),-506±1,355(第2周)和-590±1,360(第3周)/天。负平均偏差值表示较高的自我报告步骤/天。记录方法之间的平均步数/天相似,但是在个体之间观察到很大的差异,这表明自我报告的步数/天对于人口水平的PA研究可能是有效的,但对个人水平无效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号