• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte >In Search of Politics in Knowledge Production. A Plea for a Historical-Political Epistemology [Auf der suche nach der politik in der wissensproduktion: Pl?doyer für eine historisch-politische epistemologie1]
【24h】

In Search of Politics in Knowledge Production. A Plea for a Historical-Political Epistemology [Auf der suche nach der politik in der wissensproduktion: Pl?doyer für eine historisch-politische epistemologie1]

机译：在知识生产中寻找政治。对历史政治认识论的恳求[在知识生产中寻找政治：对历史政治认识论的Pl Doyer1]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Knowledge production has an intrinsic political dimension. Starting from this presupposition, it is argued that the systematic integration of and reflection on the political dimension is necessary for an adequate understanding of historical processes of knowledge production in the sciences. The consecutive plea for a historical-political epistemology proceeds in two steps: First, it is illustrated that in a number of recent historical science study cases, the political dimension is frequently marginal, or even absent. After a short discussion of previous theoretical concepts to describe the impact of politics for the production of scientific knowledge, an approach is sketched which builds on Hans-J?rg Rheinberger's historical epistemology and Bruno Latour's symmetrical anthropology. It is argued that in addition to Rheinberger's program to describe epistemic systems, the political dimension is intrinsic to three stages of the process of data production: First to an initial phase which consists in the arrangement socio-technical configurations to produce new evidence. Here, factors such as the culturally shaped perception and evaluation of "relevant" problems, as well as the perception of career resources have to be taken into account. Second, the political dimension is relevant in view of the continuous re-adjustments of the configuration of epistemic systems, e. g. towards newly available financial, technical, or intellectual resources and "relevant" challenges from outside the system. Thirdly, the data produced and represented by epistemic systems-"evidence"-are yet in need of interpretation. This process is in itself imbued with continuously shifting mechanisms of selecting and creating hierarchies amongst the pool of available data.
机译：知识生产具有内在的政治意义。从这种前提出发，有人认为，政治层面的系统整合和反思对于充分理解科学知识生产的历史过程是必要的。对历史-政治认识论的连续呼吁分两个步骤进行：首先，可以证明，在许多最近的历史科学研究案例中，政治方面常常是边缘性的，甚至根本没有。在简短地讨论了用来描述政治对科学知识产生的影响的先前理论概念之后，勾勒出了一种方法，该方法建立在汉斯·约翰·莱茵伯格的历史认识论和布鲁诺·拉图尔的对称人类学的基础上。有人认为，除了莱茵伯格描述认知系统的程序之外，政治层面是数据产生过程的三个阶段所固有的：第一阶段到初始阶段，包括安排社会技术配置以产生新证据。在这里，必须考虑诸如文化塑造的感知和对“相关”问题的评估以及对职业资源的感知等因素。第二，考虑到认知系统结构的不断调整，政治层面是重要的。 G。应对新可用的财务，技术或知识资源以及系统外部的“相关”挑战。第三，由认知系统产生和代表的数据“证据”尚需解释。该过程本身充满了在可用数据池中选择和创建层次结构的不断变化的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号