首页> 外文期刊>NACTA Journal >Evaluation of note taking method on academic performance in undergraduate animal science courses.
【24h】

Evaluation of note taking method on academic performance in undergraduate animal science courses.

机译:笔记方法对动物科学本科课程学习成绩的评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of note taking method on academic performance and attendance in undergraduate animal science courses. During year 1 of the study, students were provided with an outline of material presented in lecture. In year 2, students were provided with a detailed set of notes. Final course grade and attendance data were collected on 814 students. Note taking method data were collected on a subsample of 160 students. Least squares means for final course grades and number of absences were calculated using the mixed procedure of SAS. There was no difference in mean final course grade or mean number of absences between years 1 and 2 for the general population of students. Within the sample group, there was no difference in mean number of absences between the two note taking methods, but a significant difference in mean final course grade existed. Students that were provided with only an outline of the material had a higher (P<0.05) mean final course grade (83.70) than students that were provided a detailed set of notes (80.45). Students provided with only an outline of course material performed at a higher level than students that were provided with a detailed set of notes.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估笔记方法对动物科学本科课程的学习成绩和出勤率的影响。在研究的第一年,向学生提供了演讲中介绍的材料的大纲。第2年,向学生提供了详细的笔记。收集了814名学生的最终课程成绩和出勤率数据。笔记方法数据是在160名学生的子样本中收集的。使用SAS的混合程序计算最终课程等级的最小二乘均数和缺勤人数。普通学生在第一年和第二年之间的平均最终课程成绩或平均缺勤次数没有差异。在样本组中,两种记笔记方法的平均缺勤数量没有差异,但是平均最终课程成绩却存在显着差异。仅提供了材料大纲的学生比提供详细笔记的学生(80.45)的平均最终课程成绩(P.0.05)更高(P <0.05)。与仅提供详细笔记的学生相比,向学生提供的课程材料大纲要高得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号