• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>NACTA Journal >Student Perceptions of Animal Use in Society
【24h】

Student Perceptions of Animal Use in Society

机译：学生对社会使用动物的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine the demographic characteristics that affect students' attitudes regarding animal use. Incoming freshman (n = 136) completed a 20-question survey (Likert scale 1-5; range 20-100, summed and reported as a composite score) regarding perceptions of animal use, rights and welfare. Composite scores (CS) ranged from 54.8 to 81. Lower scores were consistent with animal rights positions and higher scores corresponded with animal use values. Composite scores were examined for correlation to varied student demographics. Major (P < 0.01); career objective (P < 0.01), geographical region (P < 0.05) and history of animal ownership (P < 0.01) significantly affected CS. Livestock science majors (70.1 ±1.1) scored higher than either equine (57.7 ± 1.3) or horticulture majors (57.9 ± 1.4). Students with livestock production career objectives scored higher (69.5 ± 1.6) than students interested in either equine production (61.5 ± 2.5) or veterinary medicine (61.2 + 1.6).Commercial livestock ownership, reported by 39.9% of students, dramatically increased (P < 0.01) CS compared with students reporting equine, pet or no animal ownership. As part of the survey, students were asked if they perceived a difference between animal rights and welfare. Gender (P < 0.05), age (P < 0.05) and home residence (P < 0.01) all significantly influenced responses. Males, non-traditional students (age >21) and urban dwellers were less likely to differentiate between animal rights and welfare than females, 17-20 year olds and students from non-urban backgrounds. This study indicates most students CS are consistent with supporting animal welfare and use.
机译：这项研究的目的是确定影响学生对动物使用态度的人口统计学特征。即将来临的新生（n = 136）完成了关于动物使用，权利和福利的20个问题的调查（Likert评分为1-5;范围为20-100，以综合得分的形式总结并报告为综合得分）。综合得分（CS）在54.8到81之间。较低的分数与动物权益的位置一致，较高的分数与动物的使用价值相对应。审查了综合得分与各种学生人口统计的相关性。大（P <0.01）;职业目标（P <0.01），地理区域（P <0.05）和动物拥有史（P <0.01）对CS有显着影响。畜牧专业（70.1±1.1）的得分高于马类（57.7±1.3）或园艺专业（57.9±1.4）。以牲畜生产为职业目标的学生得分（69.5±1.6）高于对马匹生产（61.5±2.5）或兽医学（61.2 + 1.6）感兴趣的学生。商业性畜牧所有权，占39.9％的学生，显着增加（P < 0.01）CS与报告马，宠物或无动物所有权的学生相比。作为调查的一部分，询问学生是否认为动物权利和福利之间存在差异。性别（P <0.05），年龄（P <0.05）和家庭住所（P <0.01）均显着影响反应。男性，非传统学生（21岁以上）和城市居民在动物权利和福利方面的区分可能性不及女性，17-20岁的年轻人和非城市背景的学生。这项研究表明，大多数学生CS与支持动物福利和使用相一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号