BACKGROUND: The rationale for choosing between the condylar fossa and transcondylar variations of the far-lateral approach requires understanding of the relationships between the occipital condyle, jugular tubercle, and hypoglossal canal. OBJECTIVE: We examined the anatomic relationship of these 3 structures and analyzed the effect that changes in these relationships have on the surgical exposure and angle of attack for these 2 approaches. METHODS: Anatomic measurements of 5 cadaveric heads from 3-dimensional computed tomographic scans were compared with direct measurements of the same specimens. The condylar fossa and transcondylar approach were performed sequentially in 8 of 10 sides. Surgical exposure and angle of attack were measured after each exposure. RESULTS: The jugular tubercle (JT) angle (JTA) measures the angle formed by reference points on the condyle, hypoglossal canal, and JT. When the JT and occipital condyle are not prominent (JTA > 180 degrees ), the transcondylar approach does not significantly increase petroclival or brainstem exposure compared with the condylar fossa approach; however, it does significantly increase the angle of attack to the junction of the posterior inferior cerebellar and vertebral arteries and the surgical angle for the medial part of the JT (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The condylar fossa and transcondylar approaches provide similar exposures of the petroclivus and brainstem when the JT and occipital condyle are not prominent (JTA > 180 degrees on 3-dimensional computed tomographic). However, for lesions below the hypoglossal canal, the transcondylar approach is preferred because it significantly increases the angle of attack.
展开▼
