首页> 外文期刊>Nordic journal of psychiatry. >The Danish version of the Baylor Profound Mental State Examination
【24h】

The Danish version of the Baylor Profound Mental State Examination

机译:丹麦文版的贝勒深刻精神状态考试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: An instrument of assessing the cognitive status of the severely demented is needed. Aim: To validate the Danish version of the cognitive part of the Baylor Profound Mental State Examination (BPMSE-cog). Design: Participants were residents in dementia care units. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB), the Geriatric Deterioration Scale (GDS) and the Disability Assessment of Dementia (DAD) were co-administered. Three assessments were performed: at baseline, 1 week and 6 months later. At visits 1 and 3, participants were assessed blinded by a geriatric psychiatrist (GDS, MMSE and diagnosis) and by a registered nurse (BPMSE-cog, SIB, DAD). At visit 2, assessments were made by the RN only. Testretest and inter-rater reliabilities were calculated. External validity was assessed in terms of correlation to MMSE, SIB, GDS and DAD; internal validity was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, Mokken/Loevinger coefficients and the item response analysis. Results: Inter-rater reliability and testretest reliability were very high for total scale as well as for the subscales. The external validity was satisfactory with correlation coefficients: MMSE: 0.74; SIB: 0.89; the GDS 0.83; DAD: 0.67 (P < 0.001). Results further indicate that there is a ceiling but no floor effect of the BPMSE-cog. The internal validity was highly satisfactory demonstrating sufficient internal consistency and homogeneity of the scale. The item response analysis showed an even distribution of the 25 items. Conclusion: The BPMSE-cog is a very stable and strong scale and is recommended as a severity measurement for the cognitive performance of patients suffering from severe dementia.
机译:背景:需要一种评估严重痴呆的认知状态的工具。目的:验证贝勒深刻精神状态考试(BPMSE-cog)的丹麦语版本的认知部分。设计:参与者是痴呆症监护室的居民。联合进行了迷你精神状态检查(MMSE),严重损伤电池(SIB),老年恶化量表(GDS)和痴呆症残疾评估(DAD)。进行了三个评估:基线,1周和6个月后。在第1次和第3次就诊时,由老年精神病医生(GDS,MMSE和诊断)和注册护士(BPMSE-cog,SIB,DAD)对参与者进行了盲法评估。在第2次访问中,仅由RN进行评估。计算了重新测试和评定者之间的可靠性。根据与MMSE,SIB,GDS和DAD的相关性评估外部有效性;内部有效性使用Cronbach's alpha,Mokken / Loevinger系数和项目反应分析进行评估。结果:评分员间信度和重测信度对总分表和子分表都非常高。外部效度令人满意,相关系数:MMSE:0.74;相对湿度:0.89; GDS 0.83; DAD:0.67(P <0.001)。结果进一步表明,BPMSE-cog有天花板但没有地板效应。内部有效性非常令人满意,表明该量表具有足够的内部一致性和均质性。项目响应分析显示25个项目的分布均匀。结论:BPMSE-cog量表非常稳定和强大,建议将其作为严重痴呆患者认知能力的严重程度测量指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号