• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Nurse education today >Three heads are better than one: A mixed methods study examining collaborative versus traditional test-taking with nursing students
【24h】

Three heads are better than one: A mixed methods study examining collaborative versus traditional test-taking with nursing students

机译：三个脑袋总比一个脑袋好：混合方法研究与护生一起检查协作考试与传统考试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Patient care requires a collaborative teamwork approach; therefore, nursing programs must provide students with ample opportunities to hone teamwork skills. Although collaborative testing (CT) has been utilized in higher education for decades, its uptake in nursing education has only recently surfaced. The purpose of this mixed methods study was to examine CT versus traditional test-taking with undergraduate nursing students in a Western Canadian university. Using a cross-over design, surveys, and focus groups, nursing students' experiences of learning, retention of course content, and teamwork were explored. A convenience sample of 70 students was recruited. In this paper, we present the results along with recommendations for future research. The treatment effect was highly significant with CT scores being an average of 7.99 units higher than traditional test-taking scores when the test was allocated a total score of 100. However, the two formative tests were weighted minimally resulting in participating students' overall grades being increased by an average of 1.2 out of 100. Of practical significance, students perceived that CT helped them understand the course material better and they appreciated the opportunity to practice effective communication within a group to prepare for future practice.
机译：病人护理需要协作的团队合作方式;因此，护理课程必须为学生提供充分的机会来磨练团队合作技能。尽管协作测试（CT）已在高等教育中使用了数十年，但它在护理教育中的应用才刚刚浮出水面。这项混合方法研究的目的是与加拿大西部一所大学的护理学本科生一起检查CT和传统考试方式。使用交叉设计，调查和焦点小组，研究了护理学生的学习经验，课程内容的保留和团队合作。招募了70名学生的便利样本。在本文中，我们介绍了结果以及对未来研究的建议。当总分为100时，CT评分比传统考试分数平均高出7.99个单位，治疗效果非常显着。但是，这两个形成性考试的权重最低，导致参加考试的学生的整体成绩为平均提高了100分中的1.2分。具有实际意义的是，学生认为CT帮助他们更好地理解了课程资料，并且感谢有机会在小组内进行有效的交流，为将来的练习做准备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号